Narrative:

At pushback, visibility went from 1 1/2 mi to RVR 600 ft. Taxi out required full attention and takeoff RVR was discussed as needing 600 ft/6 mi. An airliner took off ahead of us with all 3 RVR above 600 (800/800/600 as I recall). We were cleared for takeoff and tower gave RVR 1200 (no mid or rollout). During our takeoff, at about 50 KTS, the next aircraft in line was given a rollout RVR of '0.' I elected to continue takeoff roll rather than abort in low visibility. In retrospect, when given 1200 RVR just prior to takeoff, I should have asked what all 3 RVR's were. I assumed the visibility was getting better. Best not to assume anything.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: THE FLC IS WORRIED THAT THEY TOOK WITH THE ROLLOUT RVR '0.'

Narrative: AT PUSHBACK, VISIBILITY WENT FROM 1 1/2 MI TO RVR 600 FT. TAXI OUT REQUIRED FULL ATTN AND TKOF RVR WAS DISCUSSED AS NEEDING 600 FT/6 MI. AN AIRLINER TOOK OFF AHEAD OF US WITH ALL 3 RVR ABOVE 600 (800/800/600 AS I RECALL). WE WERE CLRED FOR TKOF AND TWR GAVE RVR 1200 (NO MID OR ROLLOUT). DURING OUR TKOF, AT ABOUT 50 KTS, THE NEXT ACFT IN LINE WAS GIVEN A ROLLOUT RVR OF '0.' I ELECTED TO CONTINUE TKOF ROLL RATHER THAN ABORT IN LOW VISIBILITY. IN RETROSPECT, WHEN GIVEN 1200 RVR JUST PRIOR TO TKOF, I SHOULD HAVE ASKED WHAT ALL 3 RVR'S WERE. I ASSUMED THE VISIBILITY WAS GETTING BETTER. BEST NOT TO ASSUME ANYTHING.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.