Narrative:

Reference 'callback' (feb 1995) issue, front page, from angels to grumps...first it was 'gump.' then it was 'gumps.' now I read it as 'grumps.' soon, will it be 'gramps?' or maybe 'grams?' or is it 'gump' and 'gramps?' or 'grams' and 'gramps?' or 'grumps' and 'gramps?' what happened to the old fashioned way, namely, using the original checklist that was certificated with the airplane?

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: EXPERIENCED ACR FLT CREWMEMBER MAKES COMMENTARY REGARDING 'GUMPS' VERSES CHKLISTS.

Narrative: REF 'CALLBACK' (FEB 1995) ISSUE, FRONT PAGE, FROM ANGELS TO GRUMPS...FIRST IT WAS 'GUMP.' THEN IT WAS 'GUMPS.' NOW I READ IT AS 'GRUMPS.' SOON, WILL IT BE 'GRAMPS?' OR MAYBE 'GRAMS?' OR IS IT 'GUMP' AND 'GRAMPS?' OR 'GRAMS' AND 'GRAMPS?' OR 'GRUMPS' AND 'GRAMPS?' WHAT HAPPENED TO THE OLD FASHIONED WAY, NAMELY, USING THE ORIGINAL CHKLIST THAT WAS CERTIFICATED WITH THE AIRPLANE?

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.