Narrative:

On a jan/thu/95 I flew a PA-28-181 from greenwood municipal to ind. A chkride for the part 141 assistant chief position was begun at XA30 am with the ind FSDO. Prior to the flight test, the examiner found a recurring airworthiness directive that had not been signed off in the aircraft log at the proper time on previous inspections and had not been signed off on the most recent inspection. The examiner then issued a ferry permit to return home with the aircraft. At that time, the examiner stated that no violations would be issued to the pilot, mechanic, or anyone at the flight school. When the aircraft was returned home, the airworthiness directive was complied with and properly entered in the aircraft logs.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: NON COMPLIANCE WITH AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE.

Narrative: ON A JAN/THU/95 I FLEW A PA-28-181 FROM GREENWOOD MUNICIPAL TO IND. A CHKRIDE FOR THE PART 141 ASSISTANT CHIEF POS WAS BEGUN AT XA30 AM WITH THE IND FSDO. PRIOR TO THE FLT TEST, THE EXAMINER FOUND A RECURRING AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE THAT HAD NOT BEEN SIGNED OFF IN THE ACFT LOG AT THE PROPER TIME ON PREVIOUS INSPECTIONS AND HAD NOT BEEN SIGNED OFF ON THE MOST RECENT INSPECTION. THE EXAMINER THEN ISSUED A FERRY PERMIT TO RETURN HOME WITH THE ACFT. AT THAT TIME, THE EXAMINER STATED THAT NO VIOLATIONS WOULD BE ISSUED TO THE PLT, MECH, OR ANYONE AT THE FLT SCHOOL. WHEN THE ACFT WAS RETURNED HOME, THE AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE WAS COMPLIED WITH AND PROPERLY ENTERED IN THE ACFT LOGS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.