Reporter flew aircraft to chkride not knowing an ad had not been complied with.

Attributes
ACN	295012
Time
Date	199501
Day	Thu
Local Time Of Day	0601 To 1200
Place
Locale Reference	airport : ind
State Reference	IN
Altitude	agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tower : cvg
Operator	general aviation : instructional
Make Model Name	Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	ground : preflight
Flight Plan	None
Person 1
Affiliation	Other
Function	flight crew : single pilot
Qualification	pilot : instrument pilot : cfi
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 1820 flight time type : 20
ASRS Report	295012
Person 2
Affiliation	government : faa
Function	other personnel other
Qualification	pilot : cfi pilot : atp pilot : commercial
Events
Anomaly	non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far
Independent Detector	other other : unspecified
Resolutory Action	none taken : detected after the fact
Consequence	faa : reviewed incident with flight crew Other
Supplementary
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

A flight instructor went for a 141 assistant chief instructor chkride with the FAA. The chkride was being given at the indianapolis flight standards district office. The instructor had flown the aircraft over to indianapolis international from his/her home airport that morning. The chkride/oral started by the examiner checking through the aircraft logs to make sure that the aircraft was up to standards for the check. The examiner found a recurring ad that had not been signed off in the aircraft log at the proper time on previous inspections and had not been signed off on the most recent inspection of the aircraft. The examiner then gave the flight instructor a ferry permit to fly the aircraft back to his/her home airport. The examiner at that time also told the instructor that he would not violate him/her for the occurrence. When the flight instructor returned the aircraft back to the home airport the ad was properly (double checked) complied with and signed off in the logs. The examiner also stated that he would not violate anyone at the flight school or the mechanic who performed the work.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: RPTR FLEW ACFT TO CHKRIDE NOT KNOWING AN AD HAD NOT BEEN COMPLIED WITH.

Narrative: A FLT INSTRUCTOR WENT FOR A 141 ASSISTANT CHIEF INSTRUCTOR CHKRIDE WITH THE FAA. THE CHKRIDE WAS BEING GIVEN AT THE INDIANAPOLIS FLT STANDARDS DISTRICT OFFICE. THE INSTRUCTOR HAD FLOWN THE ACFT OVER TO INDIANAPOLIS INTL FROM HIS/HER HOME ARPT THAT MORNING. THE CHKRIDE/ORAL STARTED BY THE EXAMINER CHKING THROUGH THE ACFT LOGS TO MAKE SURE THAT THE ACFT WAS UP TO STANDARDS FOR THE CHK. THE EXAMINER FOUND A RECURRING AD THAT HAD NOT BEEN SIGNED OFF IN THE ACFT LOG AT THE PROPER TIME ON PREVIOUS INSPECTIONS AND HAD NOT BEEN SIGNED OFF ON THE MOST RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ACFT. THE EXAMINER THEN GAVE THE FLT INSTRUCTOR A FERRY PERMIT TO FLY THE ACFT BACK TO HIS/HER HOME ARPT. THE EXAMINER AT THAT TIME ALSO TOLD THE INSTRUCTOR THAT HE WOULD NOT VIOLATE HIM/HER FOR THE OCCURRENCE. WHEN THE FLT INSTRUCTOR RETURNED THE ACFT BACK TO THE HOME ARPT THE AD WAS PROPERLY (DOUBLE CHKED) COMPLIED WITH AND SIGNED OFF IN THE LOGS. THE EXAMINER ALSO STATED THAT HE WOULD NOT VIOLATE ANYONE AT THE FLT SCHOOL OR THE MECH WHO PERFORMED THE WORK.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.