Corp aircraft has runway excursion and go around to salvage ILS approach.

Attributes
ACN	292604
Time
Date	199501
Day	Wed
Local Time Of Day	0601 To 1200
Place
Locale Reference	airport : ruq
State Reference	NC
Altitude	agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 msl bound lower : 0 msl bound upper : 1000
Environment
Flight Conditions	IMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tracon : clt tower : mli
Operator	general aviation : corporate
Make Model Name	Commercial Fixed Wing
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	descent : approach landing : go around landing other
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	Other
Function	flight crew : first officer
Qualification	pilot : instrument pilot : commercial
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 3500
ASRS Report	292604
Person 2
Affiliation	Other
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : atp
Events
Anomaly	non adherence : far other anomaly other anomaly other
Independent Detector	other flight crewa
Resolutory Action	flight crew : returned to intended course or assigned course flight crew : regained aircraft control other
Consequence	Other
Supplementary
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

While on a flight from cge to ruq the chief pilot took control of the aircraft on an instrument approach to ruq. Standard instrument procedures were not observed a teardrop type entry was made to intercept the final approach course. The WX was at minimums. A tight circling turn was attempted to land on the north end of the runway. The aircraft was not in a position to land on the runway. The airplane went off the side of the runway because the go around was initiated too late. There was still sufficient airspeed to fly the aircraft and it became airborne again. The aircraft was climbed out and I regained control. I entered a left downwind for the south runway and landed the aircraft safely. An inspection was made to the aircraft and there was no damage found. There was also no damage to the airport property. I believe the situation occurred because the old way of thinking was used, in that the captain is always right. I also believe in order to prevent a recurrence is to properly train all flcs in cockpit resource management.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: CORP ACFT HAS RWY EXCURSION AND GAR TO SALVAGE ILS APCH.

Narrative: WHILE ON A FLT FROM CGE TO RUQ THE CHIEF PLT TOOK CTL OF THE ACFT ON AN INST APCH TO RUQ. STANDARD INST PROCS WERE NOT OBSERVED A TEARDROP TYPE ENTRY WAS MADE TO INTERCEPT THE FINAL APCH COURSE. THE WX WAS AT MINIMUMS. A TIGHT CIRCLING TURN WAS ATTEMPTED TO LAND ON THE N END OF THE RWY. THE ACFT WAS NOT IN A POS TO LAND ON THE RWY. THE AIRPLANE WENT OFF THE SIDE OF THE RWY BECAUSE THE GAR WAS INITIATED TOO LATE. THERE WAS STILL SUFFICIENT AIRSPD TO FLY THE ACFT AND IT BECAME AIRBORNE AGAIN. THE ACFT WAS CLBED OUT AND I REGAINED CTL. I ENTERED A L DOWNWIND FOR THE S RWY AND LANDED THE ACFT SAFELY. AN INSPECTION WAS MADE TO THE ACFT AND THERE WAS NO DAMAGE FOUND. THERE WAS ALSO NO DAMAGE TO THE ARPT PROPERTY. I BELIEVE THE SIT OCCURRED BECAUSE THE OLD WAY OF THINKING WAS USED, IN THAT THE CAPT IS ALWAYS RIGHT. I ALSO BELIEVE IN ORDER TO PREVENT A RECURRENCE IS TO PROPERLY TRAIN ALL FLCS IN COCKPIT RESOURCE MGMNT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.