Narrative:

We were parked on spot 71 on the ramp awaiting our gate to open up. Flight xx was given clearance to power back from gate, a 727-200. I mean to tell you as the aircraft approached our position we were very uncomfortable and would guess he stopped 50- 75 ft from us. As I pointed out to ramp, it might be ok but not from our point of view. I would suggest in the very least if it is indeed necessary to power back aircraft with parked aircraft on the ramp, that the pwring back aircraft be made aware of the aircraft by ramp control prior to issuing a power back clearance. The captain may then accept or reject his power back clearance or in the very least have knowledge of situation around his aircraft. We have been very lucky on this several times.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: PWR BACK PLT NOT INFORMED OF ACFT PARKED BEHIND HIM. CAME TOO CLOSE.

Narrative: WE WERE PARKED ON SPOT 71 ON THE RAMP AWAITING OUR GATE TO OPEN UP. FLT XX WAS GIVEN CLRNC TO PWR BACK FROM GATE, A 727-200. I MEAN TO TELL YOU AS THE ACFT APCHED OUR POS WE WERE VERY UNCOMFORTABLE AND WOULD GUESS HE STOPPED 50- 75 FT FROM US. AS I POINTED OUT TO RAMP, IT MIGHT BE OK BUT NOT FROM OUR POINT OF VIEW. I WOULD SUGGEST IN THE VERY LEAST IF IT IS INDEED NECESSARY TO PWR BACK ACFT WITH PARKED ACFT ON THE RAMP, THAT THE PWRING BACK ACFT BE MADE AWARE OF THE ACFT BY RAMP CTL PRIOR TO ISSUING A PWR BACK CLRNC. THE CAPT MAY THEN ACCEPT OR REJECT HIS PWR BACK CLRNC OR IN THE VERY LEAST HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF SIT AROUND HIS ACFT. WE HAVE BEEN VERY LUCKY ON THIS SEVERAL TIMES.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.