Narrative:

After takeoff from runway 17 I determined that the nose gear did not retract. We radioed to come back into epply. After putting the gear handle in the down position we did not get a down and locked from the green light. In looking at the mirrors on the tip tanks we determined that the gear was not locked and down. We then made 2 fly-by's by the tower. We then proceeded north to the practice area to go through the emergency procedures. After none of them worked we returned to epply and landed there safely damaging only the gear doors with minor skin damage. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: reporter stated that the aircraft was a rented cessna 310 and the cause of the nose gear malfunction was not known to him.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: C310 NOSE GEAR WOULD NOT EXTEND AND THE ACFT RECEIVED MINOR DAMAGE TO THE NOSE GEAR DOORS ON LNDG.

Narrative: AFTER TKOF FROM RWY 17 I DETERMINED THAT THE NOSE GEAR DID NOT RETRACT. WE RADIOED TO COME BACK INTO EPPLY. AFTER PUTTING THE GEAR HANDLE IN THE DOWN POS WE DID NOT GET A DOWN AND LOCKED FROM THE GREEN LIGHT. IN LOOKING AT THE MIRRORS ON THE TIP TANKS WE DETERMINED THAT THE GEAR WAS NOT LOCKED AND DOWN. WE THEN MADE 2 FLY-BY'S BY THE TWR. WE THEN PROCEEDED N TO THE PRACTICE AREA TO GO THROUGH THE EMER PROCS. AFTER NONE OF THEM WORKED WE RETURNED TO EPPLY AND LANDED THERE SAFELY DAMAGING ONLY THE GEAR DOORS WITH MINOR SKIN DAMAGE. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR STATED THAT THE ACFT WAS A RENTED CESSNA 310 AND THE CAUSE OF THE NOSE GEAR MALFUNCTION WAS NOT KNOWN TO HIM.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.