Reporter says grb airport signage and markings need to be redone.

Attributes
ACN	271266
Time
Date	199404
Day	Fri
Local Time Of Day	1201 To 1800
Place
Locale Reference	atc facility : grb
State Reference	WI
Altitude	agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0
Environment
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Operator	common carrier : air taxi
Make Model Name	Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 135
Flight Phase	ground other : taxi
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	company : air taxi
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : atp
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 120 flight time total : 4400 flight time type : 600
ASRS Report	271266
Person 2
Affiliation	company : air taxi
Function	flight crew : first officer
Qualification	pilot : instrument pilot : commercial
Events
Anomaly	incursion : runway other anomaly other
Independent Detector	other flight crewa
Resolutory Action	none taken : detected after the fact
Consequence	Other
Supplementary
Primary Problem	Airport
Air Traffic Incident	other
Situations
Airport	other physical facility

Narrative:

After returning to grb after the incident I noted the following discrepancies at the intersection of runway 30 and taxiway J. 1) the runway side lines are faded and need a fresh coat applied. The need for this is emphasized with the lack of contrast between taxiway and runway surface. (They are both asphalt). 2) the runway hold sign is placed an excessively long way from the edge of taxiway J. 25 ft or (so), making it difficult to see. 3) runway centerline lines are faded and need a fresh application of paint. Callback conversation with tower supervisor revealed the following information: tower supervisor said runway sign and runway hold lines are clearly visible and are not faded or washed out.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: RPTR SAYS GRB ARPT SIGNAGE AND MARKINGS NEED TO BE REDONE.

Narrative: AFTER RETURNING TO GRB AFTER THE INCIDENT I NOTED THE FOLLOWING DISCREPANCIES AT THE INTXN OF RWY 30 AND TXWY J. 1) THE RWY SIDE LINES ARE FADED AND NEED A FRESH COAT APPLIED. THE NEED FOR THIS IS EMPHASIZED WITH THE LACK OF CONTRAST BTWN TXWY AND RWY SURFACE. (THEY ARE BOTH ASPHALT). 2) THE RWY HOLD SIGN IS PLACED AN EXCESSIVELY LONG WAY FROM THE EDGE OF TXWY J. 25 FT OR (SO), MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO SEE. 3) RWY CENTERLINE LINES ARE FADED AND NEED A FRESH APPLICATION OF PAINT. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH TWR SUPVR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: TWR SUPVR SAID RWY SIGN AND RWY HOLD LINES ARE CLRLY VISIBLE AND ARE NOT FADED OR WASHED OUT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.