![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 254953 |
| Time | |
| Date | 199310 |
| Day | Mon |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | atc facility : bow |
| State Reference | FL |
| Altitude | agl bound lower : 50 agl bound upper : 50 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tower : bow artcc : zab |
| Operator | general aviation : instructional |
| Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, High Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
| Flight Phase | descent : approach descent other landing : go around |
| Flight Plan | VFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Operator | general aviation : personal |
| Make Model Name | Ultralight |
| Flight Phase | climbout : takeoff ground : holding |
| Flight Plan | None |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | Other |
| Function | instruction : instructor oversight : pic |
| Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : cfi |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 100 flight time total : 630 flight time type : 350 |
| ASRS Report | 254953 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | Other |
| Function | flight crew : single pilot |
| Qualification | pilot : student |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | conflict : nmac non adherence : far non adherence : clearance |
| Independent Detector | other controllera |
| Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action other |
| Consequence | Other |
| Miss Distance | horizontal : 600 vertical : 50 |
| Supplementary | |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
The aircraft in which I was instructing was on a dual cross country flight with a student pilot who speaks poor english. Inbound to our destination we reported 6 mi west. The controller responded to report a 2 mi final. While instructing we failed to report the 2 mi final. As the aircraft was transitioning to land, the controller called out our aircraft n-number, and reported an ultralight departing on an intersecting runway (via light gun signals). Unsure of the clearance to land, I took control of the aircraft and executed a go around procedure, avoiding the ultralight behind and above its flight path. I feel that the awkward student/instructor environment resulted in the failure to report the 2 mi final. As a result there was an uncertainty about the landing clearance. In addition, the controller's failure to verify our position prior to departing another aircraft complicated the situation. I also feel that situational awareness was compromised because the ultralight was cleared for takeoff via light gun signals. If it had not been for this combination of unlikely circumstances, I don't feel that there would have been a situation at all.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: UNAUTH LNDG PROC AND NMAC WITH DEP TFC CREATES NEED FOR GAR BY SMA.
Narrative: THE ACFT IN WHICH I WAS INSTRUCTING WAS ON A DUAL XCOUNTRY FLT WITH A STUDENT PLT WHO SPEAKS POOR ENGLISH. INBOUND TO OUR DEST WE RPTED 6 MI W. THE CTLR RESPONDED TO RPT A 2 MI FINAL. WHILE INSTRUCTING WE FAILED TO RPT THE 2 MI FINAL. AS THE ACFT WAS TRANSITIONING TO LAND, THE CTLR CALLED OUT OUR ACFT N-NUMBER, AND RPTED AN ULTRALIGHT DEPARTING ON AN INTERSECTING RWY (VIA LIGHT GUN SIGNALS). UNSURE OF THE CLRNC TO LAND, I TOOK CTL OF THE ACFT AND EXECUTED A GAR PROC, AVOIDING THE ULTRALIGHT BEHIND AND ABOVE ITS FLT PATH. I FEEL THAT THE AWKWARD STUDENT/INSTRUCTOR ENVIRONMENT RESULTED IN THE FAILURE TO RPT THE 2 MI FINAL. AS A RESULT THERE WAS AN UNCERTAINTY ABOUT THE LNDG CLRNC. IN ADDITION, THE CTLR'S FAILURE TO VERIFY OUR POS PRIOR TO DEPARTING ANOTHER ACFT COMPLICATED THE SIT. I ALSO FEEL THAT SITUATIONAL AWARENESS WAS COMPROMISED BECAUSE THE ULTRALIGHT WAS CLRED FOR TKOF VIA LIGHT GUN SIGNALS. IF IT HAD NOT BEEN FOR THIS COMBINATION OF UNLIKELY CIRCUMSTANCES, I DON'T FEEL THAT THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN A SIT AT ALL.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.