![]()  | 
            37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System  | 
            
                
  | 
        
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 244171 | 
| Time | |
| Date | 199306 | 
| Day | Sat | 
| Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 | 
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : f54 | 
| State Reference | TX | 
| Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0  | 
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC | 
| Light | Daylight | 
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Operator | general aviation : instructional | 
| Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, High Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear | 
| Flight Phase | landing other | 
| Flight Plan | VFR | 
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | Other | 
| Function | instruction : instructor oversight : pic  | 
| Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : instrument pilot : commercial  | 
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 31 flight time total : 960 flight time type : 53  | 
| ASRS Report | 244171 | 
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | Other | 
| Function | flight crew : single pilot instruction : trainee  | 
| Qualification | pilot : student | 
| Events | |
| Anomaly | conflict : ground critical other anomaly other  | 
| Independent Detector | other flight crewa | 
| Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact | 
| Consequence | other | 
| Supplementary | |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance | 
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation | 
Narrative:
The surface winds were 120 at 10. Except for damp pavement from an earlier shower (the runway was a paved, well drained surface with good braking action). The conditions were good for the student's lesson in crosswind wheels lndgs in the tail wheel airplane. On the fourth touch-and-go, the student brought the tail up very high, so I commented that the tail should not be raised further. Otherwise, the student's fourth touch-and-go was an acceptable performance. On the next circuit, the student's airspeed on the approach was good, about 5 mph from the target airspeed, and the round out was smooth and effective in arresting the descent rate. Power at touchdown was idle. However, there was a slight bounce and the student overctled the pitch adjustment in transitioning to the wheels landing rollout pitch attitude causing the propeller to strike the pavement. As instructor, I recovered the bad landing for the student and we taxied off without further incident. Post-flight inspection revealed the propeller tips were bent.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: PROP STRIKE ON TAIL DRAGGER IN LNDG PROC.
Narrative: THE SURFACE WINDS WERE 120 AT 10. EXCEPT FOR DAMP PAVEMENT FROM AN EARLIER SHOWER (THE RWY WAS A PAVED, WELL DRAINED SURFACE WITH GOOD BRAKING ACTION). THE CONDITIONS WERE GOOD FOR THE STUDENT'S LESSON IN XWIND WHEELS LNDGS IN THE TAIL WHEEL AIRPLANE. ON THE FOURTH TOUCH-AND-GO, THE STUDENT BROUGHT THE TAIL UP VERY HIGH, SO I COMMENTED THAT THE TAIL SHOULD NOT BE RAISED FURTHER. OTHERWISE, THE STUDENT'S FOURTH TOUCH-AND-GO WAS AN ACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE. ON THE NEXT CIRCUIT, THE STUDENT'S AIRSPD ON THE APCH WAS GOOD, ABOUT 5 MPH FROM THE TARGET AIRSPD, AND THE ROUND OUT WAS SMOOTH AND EFFECTIVE IN ARRESTING THE DSCNT RATE. PWR AT TOUCHDOWN WAS IDLE. HOWEVER, THERE WAS A SLIGHT BOUNCE AND THE STUDENT OVERCTLED THE PITCH ADJUSTMENT IN TRANSITIONING TO THE WHEELS LNDG ROLLOUT PITCH ATTITUDE CAUSING THE PROP TO STRIKE THE PAVEMENT. AS INSTRUCTOR, I RECOVERED THE BAD LNDG FOR THE STUDENT AND WE TAXIED OFF WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT. POST-FLT INSPECTION REVEALED THE PROP TIPS WERE BENT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.