Narrative:

Automated cockpit with relatively new VNAV system, which does not do a good job with a tailwind much over 15 KTS. Crossing restriction of giber at FL230. Pilot was on other frequency, saw FL230 in altitude window, got back to first officer. He confirmed giber at FL230. We discussed VNAV 5 difficulty. He explained he had never seen it miss. I disagreed with him, explaining constraint. He selected open descent, missed giber by 300 ft. As much as you try to have good cockpit resource management and let the person make their own mistakes, you have to step in earlier. At the next crossing restriction when the same situation was occurring I intervened and directed him to start the descent earlier and in the open mode. Tailwind was 30-40 KTS. This VNAV system as I said earlier is terrible with any sort of tailwind and now you see people pushing bogus altitudes to end run the system.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: LGT FMC UNABLE TO COMPENSATE FOR TAILWINDS AND MISSES ALT XING RESTRICTION.

Narrative: AUTOMATED COCKPIT WITH RELATIVELY NEW VNAV SYS, WHICH DOES NOT DO A GOOD JOB WITH A TAILWIND MUCH OVER 15 KTS. XING RESTRICTION OF GIBER AT FL230. PLT WAS ON OTHER FREQ, SAW FL230 IN ALT WINDOW, GOT BACK TO FO. HE CONFIRMED GIBER AT FL230. WE DISCUSSED VNAV 5 DIFFICULTY. HE EXPLAINED HE HAD NEVER SEEN IT MISS. I DISAGREED WITH HIM, EXPLAINING CONSTRAINT. HE SELECTED OPEN DSCNT, MISSED GIBER BY 300 FT. AS MUCH AS YOU TRY TO HAVE GOOD COCKPIT RESOURCE MGMNT AND LET THE PERSON MAKE THEIR OWN MISTAKES, YOU HAVE TO STEP IN EARLIER. AT THE NEXT XING RESTRICTION WHEN THE SAME SIT WAS OCCURRING I INTERVENED AND DIRECTED HIM TO START THE DSCNT EARLIER AND IN THE OPEN MODE. TAILWIND WAS 30-40 KTS. THIS VNAV SYS AS I SAID EARLIER IS TERRIBLE WITH ANY SORT OF TAILWIND AND NOW YOU SEE PEOPLE PUSHING BOGUS ALTS TO END RUN THE SYS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.