Narrative:

We were inbound on the PWL1 just passing bridgeport VOR. The TCASII was tracking many targets (up to 6 on the 5 mi scale). The very busy ny approach issued traffic at 4400 ft. We were also looking out for 3800 ft that our TCASII was tracking. We saw neither aircraft. Next thing we know our TCASII issued an RA climb which my first officer started. Next, the TCASII issued an RA descend as I was telling ATC of our altitude change. ATC next informed us our 4400 traffic was 1 mi from us, and we were now descending out of 4400 ft. We were at 4000, our TCASII RA climbed us for 3800 ft traffic, that flew us into the 4400 ft traffic, this then gave us an RA descend. If not for a little luck, there could have been an accident. ATC could route us for a higher (above 10000 ft). It would keep us out of the multiple VFR targets.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: TCASII WAS EVADING 2 ACFT, 1 AT 4400 FT AND THE OTHER AT 3800 FT.

Narrative: WE WERE INBOUND ON THE PWL1 JUST PASSING BRIDGEPORT VOR. THE TCASII WAS TRACKING MANY TARGETS (UP TO 6 ON THE 5 MI SCALE). THE VERY BUSY NY APCH ISSUED TFC AT 4400 FT. WE WERE ALSO LOOKING OUT FOR 3800 FT THAT OUR TCASII WAS TRACKING. WE SAW NEITHER ACFT. NEXT THING WE KNOW OUR TCASII ISSUED AN RA CLB WHICH MY FO STARTED. NEXT, THE TCASII ISSUED AN RA DSND AS I WAS TELLING ATC OF OUR ALT CHANGE. ATC NEXT INFORMED US OUR 4400 TFC WAS 1 MI FROM US, AND WE WERE NOW DSNDING OUT OF 4400 FT. WE WERE AT 4000, OUR TCASII RA CLBED US FOR 3800 FT TFC, THAT FLEW US INTO THE 4400 FT TFC, THIS THEN GAVE US AN RA DSND. IF NOT FOR A LITTLE LUCK, THERE COULD HAVE BEEN AN ACCIDENT. ATC COULD RTE US FOR A HIGHER (ABOVE 10000 FT). IT WOULD KEEP US OUT OF THE MULTIPLE VFR TARGETS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.