Narrative:

The aircraft TCASII system was squawked as giving false TCASII alerts on the #2 system on the inbound flight. I read the release and assumed that either it would be fixed, or the #2 system should not be used, but that #1 system was ok. On takeoff, I used the #1 system. Climbing through FL220 we received an RA alert to descend. We pushed the nose down to start the RA maneuver, then the alert disappeared. Responding to the RA only caused the aircraft to reduce the rate of climb from 3000 FPM climb to 1000 FPM climb. No actual level off or descent occurred. ATC was advised and we were told there was no aircraft on radar within our area. Closer inspection of the maintenance release document showed that the system was deferred inoperative. However, there were no circuit breakers pulled or deferred stickers next to the TCASII switch, as there should have been.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FALSE TCASII RA OCCURS WITH TCASII MAINT DEFERRED.

Narrative: THE ACFT TCASII SYS WAS SQUAWKED AS GIVING FALSE TCASII ALERTS ON THE #2 SYS ON THE INBOUND FLT. I READ THE RELEASE AND ASSUMED THAT EITHER IT WOULD BE FIXED, OR THE #2 SYS SHOULD NOT BE USED, BUT THAT #1 SYS WAS OK. ON TKOF, I USED THE #1 SYS. CLBING THROUGH FL220 WE RECEIVED AN RA ALERT TO DSND. WE PUSHED THE NOSE DOWN TO START THE RA MANEUVER, THEN THE ALERT DISAPPEARED. RESPONDING TO THE RA ONLY CAUSED THE ACFT TO REDUCE THE RATE OF CLB FROM 3000 FPM CLB TO 1000 FPM CLB. NO ACTUAL LEVEL OFF OR DSCNT OCCURRED. ATC WAS ADVISED AND WE WERE TOLD THERE WAS NO ACFT ON RADAR WITHIN OUR AREA. CLOSER INSPECTION OF THE MAINT RELEASE DOCUMENT SHOWED THAT THE SYS WAS DEFERRED INOP. HOWEVER, THERE WERE NO CIRCUIT BREAKERS PULLED OR DEFERRED STICKERS NEXT TO THE TCASII SWITCH, AS THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.