Narrative:

We departed runway 22 at bos -- were initially assigned a southeasterly heading -- our WX radar was painting contouring cells from our 10 O'clock position to our 3 O'clock position. We were assigned an easterly heading by ATC. Requested a further turn to the north for WX avoidance. Request seemed to be ignored by ATC repeatedly as he insisted on a southeasterly heading. After our repeated objections to his southeasterly heading, he informed us his radar was not painting any significant WX in our vicinity. As he (controller) was transmitting, we were struck by lightning. We were already in moderate to heavy rain as we skirted the northern edge of the WX depicted on our radar. Understand we were conflicting with inbound traffic but obviously our situation dictated a routing other than the normal departure routing. Traffic departing bos behind us were following similar route for WX avoidance. Supplemental information from acn 218255: 'our radar shows you 3 mi from any level 3 storms and 4 mi from any level 4 storms.' we were in heavy rain at the time and just as he finished giving us 'his WX report,' we took a lightning strike. I gave him my opinion of what he could do with his radar. ATC must realize our radar is designed for 'WX' information only and is, therefore, much more accurate than his. Our reluctance to accept his vectors was based on safety and comfort to our passenger -- not to cause him problems.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN LGT ACR CREW WAS STRUCK BY LIGHTNING WHILE TRYING TO NEGOTIATE SAFE PASSAGE AROUND WX.

Narrative: WE DEPARTED RWY 22 AT BOS -- WERE INITIALLY ASSIGNED A SOUTHEASTERLY HDG -- OUR WX RADAR WAS PAINTING CONTOURING CELLS FROM OUR 10 O'CLOCK POS TO OUR 3 O'CLOCK POS. WE WERE ASSIGNED AN EASTERLY HDG BY ATC. REQUESTED A FURTHER TURN TO THE N FOR WX AVOIDANCE. REQUEST SEEMED TO BE IGNORED BY ATC REPEATEDLY AS HE INSISTED ON A SOUTHEASTERLY HDG. AFTER OUR REPEATED OBJECTIONS TO HIS SOUTHEASTERLY HDG, HE INFORMED US HIS RADAR WAS NOT PAINTING ANY SIGNIFICANT WX IN OUR VICINITY. AS HE (CTLR) WAS XMITTING, WE WERE STRUCK BY LIGHTNING. WE WERE ALREADY IN MODERATE TO HVY RAIN AS WE SKIRTED THE NORTHERN EDGE OF THE WX DEPICTED ON OUR RADAR. UNDERSTAND WE WERE CONFLICTING WITH INBOUND TFC BUT OBVIOUSLY OUR SITUATION DICTATED A RTING OTHER THAN THE NORMAL DEP RTING. TFC DEPARTING BOS BEHIND US WERE FOLLOWING SIMILAR RTE FOR WX AVOIDANCE. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 218255: 'OUR RADAR SHOWS YOU 3 MI FROM ANY LEVEL 3 STORMS AND 4 MI FROM ANY LEVEL 4 STORMS.' WE WERE IN HVY RAIN AT THE TIME AND JUST AS HE FINISHED GIVING US 'HIS WX RPT,' WE TOOK A LIGHTNING STRIKE. I GAVE HIM MY OPINION OF WHAT HE COULD DO WITH HIS RADAR. ATC MUST REALIZE OUR RADAR IS DESIGNED FOR 'WX' INFO ONLY AND IS, THEREFORE, MUCH MORE ACCURATE THAN HIS. OUR RELUCTANCE TO ACCEPT HIS VECTORS WAS BASED ON SAFETY AND COMFORT TO OUR PAX -- NOT TO CAUSE HIM PROBLEMS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.