Narrative:

I was the pilot of small aircraft executing an ILS approach to ithaca, ny, and encountered moderate mixed icing in clouds. Pitot heat was inoperative causing loss of airspeed indication. Due to partial panel and icing conditions, I declared an emergency and requested vectors towards a known area of better WX conditions at binghamton, ny, (900 ft overcast with 8 mi visibility and no reported ice). I landed the aircraft at binghamton without further incident. In retrospect I should have done 2 things differently. First I should have checked the operation of pitot heat during the preflight inspection. And second, just prior to the approach ATC informed me that there was a report of 'trace of rime ice in the ithaca area.' I should have taken this as a warning that icing conditions existed and not flown into the area.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: PLT OF SMA ENCOUNTERS IN FLT ICING WHICH AFFECTS HIS AIRSPD READOUT AS HIS INOP PITOT HEATER ALLOWS ICE BUILDUP ON PITOT TUBE (ONE COOL VENTURE)!

Narrative: I WAS THE PLT OF SMA EXECUTING AN ILS APCH TO ITHACA, NY, AND ENCOUNTERED MODERATE MIXED ICING IN CLOUDS. PITOT HEAT WAS INOP CAUSING LOSS OF AIRSPD INDICATION. DUE TO PARTIAL PANEL AND ICING CONDITIONS, I DECLARED AN EMER AND REQUESTED VECTORS TOWARDS A KNOWN AREA OF BETTER WX CONDITIONS AT BINGHAMTON, NY, (900 FT OVCST WITH 8 MI VISIBILITY AND NO RPTED ICE). I LANDED THE ACFT AT BINGHAMTON WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT. IN RETROSPECT I SHOULD HAVE DONE 2 THINGS DIFFERENTLY. FIRST I SHOULD HAVE CHKED THE OP OF PITOT HEAT DURING THE PREFLT INSPECTION. AND SECOND, JUST PRIOR TO THE APCH ATC INFORMED ME THAT THERE WAS A RPT OF 'TRACE OF RIME ICE IN THE ITHACA AREA.' I SHOULD HAVE TAKEN THIS AS A WARNING THAT ICING CONDITIONS EXISTED AND NOT FLOWN INTO THE AREA.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.