Narrative:

Descending into lansing, approach asked us if we had the airport in sight, the captain told me to say yes. We were cleared for the visual approach. The captain soon realized that what he was looking at was not the airport. We soon saw the airport and had to make a fairly large correction to the east. At which time lansing tower said we were still cleared for the visual, but implied that they were wondering why we were so far south of the airport. If there had been traffic on downwind there could have been a conflict, since tower was expecting us to be out on final based on approach control's previous vectors. Don't call the field in sight unless you are positive!

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ACR MLG TRYING TO CONTINUE A VISUAL APCH WITHOUT THE ARPT IN SIGHT.

Narrative: DSNDING INTO LANSING, APCH ASKED US IF WE HAD THE ARPT IN SIGHT, THE CAPT TOLD ME TO SAY YES. WE WERE CLRED FOR THE VISUAL APCH. THE CAPT SOON REALIZED THAT WHAT HE WAS LOOKING AT WAS NOT THE ARPT. WE SOON SAW THE ARPT AND HAD TO MAKE A FAIRLY LARGE CORRECTION TO THE EAST. AT WHICH TIME LANSING TWR SAID WE WERE STILL CLRED FOR THE VISUAL, BUT IMPLIED THAT THEY WERE WONDERING WHY WE WERE SO FAR SOUTH OF THE ARPT. IF THERE HAD BEEN TFC ON DOWNWIND THERE COULD HAVE BEEN A CONFLICT, SINCE TWR WAS EXPECTING US TO BE OUT ON FINAL BASED ON APCH CTL'S PREVIOUS VECTORS. DON'T CALL THE FIELD IN SIGHT UNLESS YOU ARE POSITIVE!

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.