Narrative:

The INS navigation units were reprogrammed to insert the coordinates for merly intersection so that we could proceed direct to it. Several mins after proceeding direct to merly, the captain left the cockpit to attend to physiological needs. Shortly thereafter, our flight was handed off to london control. Upon making initial contact, london control had a revision to our routing. I copied the clearance as merly UR37 sam direct mid direct cln UR12 amsterdam. London center also inquired as to whether we would be able to accept FL370 for traffic separation. I told london to stand by while we checked on whether we would be able to climb to FL370. At this time, I would estimate that we were 120 NM to the west of merly. The INS units would require reprogramming for the revised routing after merly, but there was at least 12 mins before we would get to merly. Our procedures call for INS waypoint insertion to be done by the captain under normal circumstances, and I expected him back in the cockpit well before reaching merly. Therefore, I did not reprogram the INS units (insert waypoint coordinates) for the routing after merly. After checking on the feasibility of climbing to FL370, I happened to notice that there was another intersection (norla) on UR37 closer to the position. I asked london control if they had intended us to proceed direct to norla (instead of merly). The controller replied yes and gave our position as 12 NM southwest of norla. I immediately inserted the coordinates for norla into the INS units as waypoint #3 (previously merly). After inserting the coordinates, I selected present position direct norla. Unfortunately, before I could program the waypoints for the revised routing, we reached norla intersection and the aircraft took up a course to the next waypoint on our previous routing bcn VOR. The controller noticed our deviation from UR37 and issued a heading of 120 degree to reintercept the airway. At this time, the captain reentered the cockpit, and the INS units were reprogrammed for the new routing to amsterdam. VOR navigation was utilized until reprogramming was complete.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FO, ONLY FLYING OFFICER ON DECK, MISREAD CLRNC, LATE INSERTING WAYPOINT, COURSE DEV FROM CLRNC.

Narrative: THE INS NAV UNITS WERE REPROGRAMMED TO INSERT THE COORDINATES FOR MERLY INTXN SO THAT WE COULD PROCEED DIRECT TO IT. SEVERAL MINS AFTER PROCEEDING DIRECT TO MERLY, THE CAPT LEFT THE COCKPIT TO ATTEND TO PHYSIOLOGICAL NEEDS. SHORTLY THEREAFTER, OUR FLT WAS HANDED OFF TO LONDON CTL. UPON MAKING INITIAL CONTACT, LONDON CTL HAD A REVISION TO OUR ROUTING. I COPIED THE CLRNC AS MERLY UR37 SAM DIRECT MID DIRECT CLN UR12 AMSTERDAM. LONDON CENTER ALSO INQUIRED AS TO WHETHER WE WOULD BE ABLE TO ACCEPT FL370 FOR TFC SEPARATION. I TOLD LONDON TO STAND BY WHILE WE CHKED ON WHETHER WE WOULD BE ABLE TO CLB TO FL370. AT THIS TIME, I WOULD ESTIMATE THAT WE WERE 120 NM TO THE W OF MERLY. THE INS UNITS WOULD REQUIRE REPROGRAMMING FOR THE REVISED ROUTING AFTER MERLY, BUT THERE WAS AT LEAST 12 MINS BEFORE WE WOULD GET TO MERLY. OUR PROCS CALL FOR INS WAYPOINT INSERTION TO BE DONE BY THE CAPT UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES, AND I EXPECTED HIM BACK IN THE COCKPIT WELL BEFORE REACHING MERLY. THEREFORE, I DID NOT REPROGRAM THE INS UNITS (INSERT WAYPOINT COORDINATES) FOR THE ROUTING AFTER MERLY. AFTER CHKING ON THE FEASIBILITY OF CLBING TO FL370, I HAPPENED TO NOTICE THAT THERE WAS ANOTHER INTXN (NORLA) ON UR37 CLOSER TO THE POS. I ASKED LONDON CTL IF THEY HAD INTENDED US TO PROCEED DIRECT TO NORLA (INSTEAD OF MERLY). THE CTLR REPLIED YES AND GAVE OUR POS AS 12 NM SW OF NORLA. I IMMEDIATELY INSERTED THE COORDINATES FOR NORLA INTO THE INS UNITS AS WAYPOINT #3 (PREVIOUSLY MERLY). AFTER INSERTING THE COORDINATES, I SELECTED PRESENT POS DIRECT NORLA. UNFORTUNATELY, BEFORE I COULD PROGRAM THE WAYPOINTS FOR THE REVISED ROUTING, WE REACHED NORLA INTXN AND THE ACFT TOOK UP A COURSE TO THE NEXT WAYPOINT ON OUR PREVIOUS ROUTING BCN VOR. THE CTLR NOTICED OUR DEV FROM UR37 AND ISSUED A HDG OF 120 DEG TO REINTERCEPT THE AIRWAY. AT THIS TIME, THE CAPT REENTERED THE COCKPIT, AND THE INS UNITS WERE REPROGRAMMED FOR THE NEW ROUTING TO AMSTERDAM. VOR NAV WAS UTILIZED UNTIL REPROGRAMMING WAS COMPLETE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.