![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 183514 |
| Time | |
| Date | 199107 |
| Day | Thu |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : den |
| State Reference | CO |
| Altitude | msl bound lower : 1500 msl bound upper : 1500 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tower : den |
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
| Make Model Name | Medium Transport |
| Flight Phase | descent : approach |
| Route In Use | approach : visual |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : first officer |
| Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : cfi |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 2800 flight time type : 1400 |
| ASRS Report | 183514 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
| Qualification | pilot : atp |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical other anomaly other |
| Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
| Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
| Consequence | Other |
| Supplementary | |
| Primary Problem | Aircraft |
| Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
On final approach to den on air carrier flight from dro. Flying an mdt on a visual approach to runway 25, #4 engine failed with no prior indication. Flight landed runway 26R. #3 fuel quantity gauge was deferred. In flight received #4 fuel low level warnings and transferred fuel to #4 tank from #1 and #2. After warnings also activated #4 fuel auxiliary pump in order to ensure fuel in collector cell. The apparent cause of #4 engine failure was fuel starvation. I believe a check valve was stuck open allowing fuel from #4 fuel tank into #3 fuel tank thus giving the #3 fuel gauge a high indication which was in fact correct. I believe the faulty gauge was #4 which read normal indications but ran out with an indication of 500 pounds on the #4 gauge. I don't believe fuel quantity gauges should ever be a deferrable item and I hope this report will help to change that.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ACR HAS FUEL TRANSFER PROBLEM. ENGINE FAILURE ON APCH.
Narrative: ON FINAL APCH TO DEN ON ACR FLT FROM DRO. FLYING AN MDT ON A VISUAL APCH TO RWY 25, #4 ENG FAILED WITH NO PRIOR INDICATION. FLT LANDED RWY 26R. #3 FUEL QUANTITY GAUGE WAS DEFERRED. IN FLT RECEIVED #4 FUEL LOW LEVEL WARNINGS AND TRANSFERRED FUEL TO #4 TANK FROM #1 AND #2. AFTER WARNINGS ALSO ACTIVATED #4 FUEL AUX PUMP IN ORDER TO ENSURE FUEL IN COLLECTOR CELL. THE APPARENT CAUSE OF #4 ENG FAILURE WAS FUEL STARVATION. I BELIEVE A CHK VALVE WAS STUCK OPEN ALLOWING FUEL FROM #4 FUEL TANK INTO #3 FUEL TANK THUS GIVING THE #3 FUEL GAUGE A HIGH INDICATION WHICH WAS IN FACT CORRECT. I BELIEVE THE FAULTY GAUGE WAS #4 WHICH READ NORMAL INDICATIONS BUT RAN OUT WITH AN INDICATION OF 500 POUNDS ON THE #4 GAUGE. I DON'T BELIEVE FUEL QUANTITY GAUGES SHOULD EVER BE A DEFERRABLE ITEM AND I HOPE THIS RPT WILL HELP TO CHANGE THAT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.