Narrative:

In-flight visibility was less than a mi in haze. Tower visibility was reported at 4 mi. Approach pointed out VFR traffic at 12 O'clock opp direction at 4 mi who was at 3500'. We were at 4000'. Initially his altitude read 500' below us. As he approached 2 mi his altitude read 300' below and climbing. TCASII immediately commanded 'climb, climb now!' we followed the TCASII climb instructions to 4500' and stayed there until TCASII advised 'clear of conflict.' ATC was advised and we returned to assigned altitude and made a non-eventful landing. Never did see the traffic. ATC advised that light aircraft had 'strayed' off his altitude. TCASII worked wonderfully! To avoid further conflicts would recommend that we not mix light aircraft in same patterns as jets. Also we need a better way of determining pattern in-flight visibility, not tower visibility.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ACR HAS TCASII RA. RESPONDS.

Narrative: INFLT VIS WAS LESS THAN A MI IN HAZE. TWR VIS WAS RPTED AT 4 MI. APCH POINTED OUT VFR TFC AT 12 O'CLOCK OPP DIRECTION AT 4 MI WHO WAS AT 3500'. WE WERE AT 4000'. INITIALLY HIS ALT READ 500' BELOW US. AS HE APCHED 2 MI HIS ALT READ 300' BELOW AND CLBING. TCASII IMMEDIATELY COMMANDED 'CLB, CLB NOW!' WE FOLLOWED THE TCASII CLB INSTRUCTIONS TO 4500' AND STAYED THERE UNTIL TCASII ADVISED 'CLR OF CONFLICT.' ATC WAS ADVISED AND WE RETURNED TO ASSIGNED ALT AND MADE A NON-EVENTFUL LNDG. NEVER DID SEE THE TFC. ATC ADVISED THAT LIGHT ACFT HAD 'STRAYED' OFF HIS ALT. TCASII WORKED WONDERFULLY! TO AVOID FURTHER CONFLICTS WOULD RECOMMEND THAT WE NOT MIX LIGHT ACFT IN SAME PATTERNS AS JETS. ALSO WE NEED A BETTER WAY OF DETERMINING PATTERN INFLT VIS, NOT TWR VIS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.