Potential conflict for 2 aircraft on short final for 2 different runways at gnv.

Attributes
ACN	181694
Time
Date	199106
Day	Fri
Local Time Of Day	1201 To 1800
Place
Locale Reference	airport : gnv
State Reference	FL
Altitude	agl bound lower : 300 agl bound upper : 300
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tower : gnv
Operator	common carrier : air carrier
Make Model Name	Light Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng
Flight Phase	descent : approach landing : go around
Route In Use	approach : straight in
Flight Plan	IFR
Aircraft 2
Make Model Name	Small Aircraft, High Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear
Flight Phase	descent : approach landing other
Route In Use	approach : straight in
Person 1
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : atp
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 145 flight time total : 4510 flight time type : 1500
ASRS Report	181694
Person 2
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : first officer
Qualification	pilot : commercial pilot : instrument
Events
Anomaly	conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : required legal separation non adherence : published procedure
Independent Detector	other flight crewa
Resolutory Action	flight crew : took evasive action other
Consequence	Other
Miss Distance	horizontal : 0 vertical : 200
Supplementary
Primary Problem	ATC Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Operational Deviation

Narrative:

On final for a visibility approach to runway 10, we were cleared to land and told we would be #1 for the airport. We were converging with an small aircraft Y on final for runway 6. At 300' AGL, with both aircraft the same distance from the airport, the tower told us we would be #2 following the small aircraft Y. Since we were at least 70 KTS faster than the small aircraft Y it was impossible. We initiated an uneventful go around and came back around and landed.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: POTENTIAL CONFLICT FOR 2 ACFT ON SHORT FINAL FOR 2 DIFFERENT RWYS AT GNV.

Narrative: ON FINAL FOR A VIS APCH TO RWY 10, WE WERE CLRED TO LAND AND TOLD WE WOULD BE #1 FOR THE ARPT. WE WERE CONVERGING WITH AN SMA Y ON FINAL FOR RWY 6. AT 300' AGL, WITH BOTH ACFT THE SAME DISTANCE FROM THE ARPT, THE TWR TOLD US WE WOULD BE #2 FOLLOWING THE SMA Y. SINCE WE WERE AT LEAST 70 KTS FASTER THAN THE SMA Y IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE. WE INITIATED AN UNEVENTFUL GAR AND CAME BACK AROUND AND LANDED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.