![]()  | 
            37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System  | 
            
                
  | 
        
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 179705 | 
| Time | |
| Date | 199105 | 
| Day | Mon | 
| Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 | 
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : luf | 
| State Reference | OH | 
| Altitude | msl bound lower : 0 msl bound upper : 0  | 
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC | 
| Light | Daylight | 
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Operator | general aviation : personal | 
| Make Model Name | Small Aircraft | 
| Flight Phase | landing other | 
| Flight Plan | None | 
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | Other | 
| Function | flight crew : single pilot | 
| Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : commercial  | 
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 3 flight time total : 6200 flight time type : 280  | 
| ASRS Report | 179705 | 
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | government : faa | 
| Function | observation : air carrier inspector | 
| Qualification | other other : other pilot : atp  | 
| Events | |
| Anomaly | other anomaly other | 
| Independent Detector | other other : unspecified | 
| Resolutory Action | other | 
| Consequence | faa : investigated | 
| Supplementary | |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance | 
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation | 
Narrative:
I was a participant in a hot air balloon competition in cincinnati, oh, and was flying under a waiver that lowered minimum altitudes to 500' over congested areas and 200' over sparsely populated areas. The 'hare' balloon placed the target on a golf course where a tournament was being held. I believe that the local FSDO is cracking down on balloons and their interpretation of appropriate landing sites for balloons. I landed downwind of the golf course at a water treatment plant. Minimum altitudes apply, 'except when necessary for takeoff or landing.' the local FSDO is trying to interpret this as saying that a balloon cannot takeoff or land in a congested area--that it is not necessary to takeoff or land in a congested area. While I do not believe that I violated any far's during my flight, I am filing this NASA report as a precaution due to the possibility of a different interpretation by the cincinnati FSDO.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FSDO INSPECTOR CLAIMS BALLOON PLT VIOLATES PROVISIONS OF FEDERAL AVIATION REGS CONCERNING BALLOON OPERATIONS.
Narrative: I WAS A PARTICIPANT IN A HOT AIR BALLOON COMPETITION IN CINCINNATI, OH, AND WAS FLYING UNDER A WAIVER THAT LOWERED MINIMUM ALTS TO 500' OVER CONGESTED AREAS AND 200' OVER SPARSELY POPULATED AREAS. THE 'HARE' BALLOON PLACED THE TARGET ON A GOLF COURSE WHERE A TOURNAMENT WAS BEING HELD. I BELIEVE THAT THE LCL FSDO IS CRACKING DOWN ON BALLOONS AND THEIR INTERP OF APPROPRIATE LNDG SITES FOR BALLOONS. I LANDED DOWNWIND OF THE GOLF COURSE AT A WATER TREATMENT PLANT. MINIMUM ALTS APPLY, 'EXCEPT WHEN NECESSARY FOR TKOF OR LNDG.' THE LCL FSDO IS TRYING TO INTERPRET THIS AS SAYING THAT A BALLOON CANNOT TKOF OR LAND IN A CONGESTED AREA--THAT IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO TKOF OR LAND IN A CONGESTED AREA. WHILE I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT I VIOLATED ANY FAR'S DURING MY FLT, I AM FILING THIS NASA RPT AS A PRECAUTION DUE TO THE POSSIBILITY OF A DIFFERENT INTERP BY THE CINCINNATI FSDO.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.