Narrative:

Captain rejected the takeoff due to differences in airspeed indicators on captain and first officer pfd. At '80 kts.' callout (made by first officer; since captain was pilot flying); captain pfd indicated 60 kts. Captain cross checked first officer pfd and saw approaching 90 kts.; while captain saw 65-70 kts. On his pfd. Captain rejected takeoff; flight returned to gate; and maintenance was advised.close inspection of captain's pitot probe (standing on a ladder and shining a flashlight into the tube) revealed an insect/bug embedded in the probe.during periods of aircraft non-use of 6-8 [hours] on the ground during the day; and overnight periods; the pitot probes should be covered to prevent bugs and insects from crawling into the warm probes and causing erroneous speed indications.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A320 flight crew reported that erroneous airspeed readout resulted in a rejected takeoff.

Narrative: Captain rejected the takeoff due to differences in airspeed indicators on Captain and First Officer PFD. At '80 kts.' callout (made by First Officer; since Captain was Pilot Flying); Captain PFD indicated 60 kts. Captain cross checked First Officer PFD and saw approaching 90 kts.; while Captain saw 65-70 kts. on his PFD. Captain rejected takeoff; flight returned to gate; and Maintenance was advised.Close inspection of Captain's pitot probe (standing on a ladder and shining a flashlight INTO the tube) revealed an insect/bug embedded in the probe.During periods of aircraft non-use of 6-8 [hours] on the ground during the day; and overnight periods; the pitot probes should be covered to prevent bugs and insects from crawling into the warm probes and causing erroneous speed indications.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.