 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Air carrier flight crew reported the aircraft had a bounced landing resulting in a go-around. The crew cited the handling and performance characteristics of the lightly loaded aircraft as a contributing factor.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1739176 |
| Time | |
| Date | 202004 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
| State Reference | US |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Landing |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | First Officer Pilot Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Person 2 | |
| Function | Check Pilot |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Speed All Types Ground Event / Encounter Other / Unknown |
Narrative:
After getting the weather in ZZZ [we] decided to fly a CAT III to runway xx thinking we might not see the runway on a CAT I. Weather was X00 overcast. We setup; briefed and flew the CAT III approach. The approach was uneventful. At about 100 feet the ca noted my sink rate was a bit high. I began to pull back on the yoke more at the same time adding some power which made the problem worse with such a light airplane. We made a bounced landing and I decided to make a go-around. As I added power we might have lightly touched again; but made a successful go-around and clean up. After clean up the ca decided to make the landing on xy.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Air carrier flight crew reported the aircraft had a bounced landing resulting in a go-around. The crew cited the handling and performance characteristics of the lightly loaded aircraft as a contributing factor.
Narrative: After getting the weather in ZZZ [we] decided to fly a CAT III to Runway XX thinking we might not see the runway on a CAT I. Weather was X00 overcast. We setup; briefed and flew the CAT III approach. The approach was uneventful. At about 100 feet the CA noted my sink rate was a bit high. I began to pull back on the yoke more at the same time adding some power which made the problem worse with such a light airplane. We made a bounced landing and I decided to make a go-around. As I added power we might have lightly touched again; but made a successful go-around and clean up. After clean up the CA decided to make the landing on XY.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.