![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1726670 |
| Time | |
| Date | 202002 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZME.ARTCC |
| State Reference | TN |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Dusk |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Regional Jet 200 ER/LR (CRJ200) |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Climb |
| Route In Use | Direct |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Component | |
| Aircraft Component | Engine |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Person 2 | |
| Function | Pilot Not Flying First Officer |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Upon climb out; we experienced a series of events which led to a left engine failure. The first officer and I decided that while we were running checklists; briefing the flight attendant and passengers; and talking to dispatch and ATC; that we would head toward our intended destination and be set up on final approach by the time we were finished. At the end of the QRH procedures; it says to land at the nearest suitable airport; which at the time of the event would have been a closer airport. However my thought was that by the time we would've held; completed all of our tasks and descended; we would've already been just as close to our destination anyway; which has better services for our situation. I decided that it would not adversely affect the safety of flight and elected to continue to our destination.the main cause of this event was that I did not read the words 'land at the nearest suitable airport' carefully enough and fully comprehend what it was saying. At the time; our destination was the nearest suitable airport in my mind; and once I had decided that; I had tunnel vision focus and did not consider alternatives.moving forward; I will be aware of my tendency to set up this tunnel vision so that I'm easily able to come out of it and consider alternatives to my plan if needed. I will not say that it was an unsafe decision to continue to destination; in fact I feel as though my decision was well-founded. However; the fact still remains that it was indeed technically contrary to the language used in the QRH.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A flight crew reported they had to shut down an engine but continued to their destination instead of landing at a closer airport as stated in the QRH.
Narrative: Upon climb out; we experienced a series of events which led to a left engine failure. The First Officer and I decided that while we were running checklists; briefing the Flight Attendant and passengers; and talking to Dispatch and ATC; that we would head toward our intended destination and be set up on final approach by the time we were finished. At the end of the QRH procedures; it says to land at the nearest suitable airport; which at the time of the event would have been a closer airport. However my thought was that by the time we would've held; completed all of our tasks and descended; we would've already been just as close to our destination anyway; which has better services for our situation. I decided that it would not adversely affect the safety of flight and elected to continue to our destination.The main cause of this event was that I did not read the words 'land at the nearest suitable airport' carefully enough and fully comprehend what it was saying. At the time; our destination was the nearest suitable airport in my mind; and once I had decided that; I had tunnel vision focus and did not consider alternatives.Moving forward; I will be aware of my tendency to set up this tunnel vision so that I'm easily able to come out of it and consider alternatives to my plan if needed. I will not say that it was an unsafe decision to continue to destination; in fact I feel as though my decision was well-founded. However; the fact still remains that it was indeed technically contrary to the language used in the QRH.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.