![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1714188 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201912 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | DEN.Airport |
| State Reference | CO |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Medium Transport Low Wing 2 Turbojet Eng |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Descent |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | First Officer Pilot Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine |
| Person 2 | |
| Function | Pilot Not Flying Captain |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Altitude Overshoot Deviation - Procedural Clearance Inflight Event / Encounter CFTT / CFIT |
Narrative:
Assigned heading and altitude during arrival; ATC notified us of a low altitude alert as pm (pilot monitoring) and PF (pilot flying) agreed that they were too low and arrested the decent. ATC assigned a new altitude and heading that was immediately complied with via assuming manual control. The flight returned to a safe altitude and completed an uneventful approach and landing. I believe [that] during the read back; the pm transposed heading 170 and 9;000 feet assigned with heading 190 and 7;000 feet assigned. The fcp was selected to heading 190 and 7;000 feet in the altitude window. Better monitoring by the PF could have helped mitigate this transposition. Also when both the PF and pm questioned the apparent low altitude; a more immediate halt of the descent and a query to ATC would have been the most appropriate course of action.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Air carrier flight crew reported experiencing miscommunication that led to a low altitude alert.
Narrative: Assigned heading and altitude during arrival; ATC notified us of a low altitude alert as PM (Pilot Monitoring) and PF (Pilot Flying) agreed that they were too low and arrested the decent. ATC assigned a new altitude and heading that was immediately complied with via assuming manual control. The flight returned to a safe altitude and completed an uneventful approach and landing. I believe [that] during the read back; the PM transposed heading 170 and 9;000 feet assigned with heading 190 and 7;000 feet assigned. The FCP was selected to heading 190 and 7;000 feet in the altitude window. Better monitoring by the PF could have helped mitigate this transposition. Also when both the PF and PM questioned the apparent low altitude; a more immediate halt of the descent and a query to ATC would have been the most appropriate course of action.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.