Narrative:

Controller pilot datalink communication (cpdlc) instruction was 'cleared to ZZZ aprt LGA5 except turn left heading 360 for rv then as filed'. When I received and acknowledged the clearance; I read it to the captain stating expect turn to 360 instead of except ....' nothing more; the captain read the cpdlc and acknowledged what we briefed. Captain was PF. We were cleared for takeoff from runway 4 and we commented that usually they state 'turn to heading ###'; however; tower frequency was too busy to inquire and in the absence of further instruction we turned to the SID heading of 051 degrees. Once transferred to departure control; he gave us a heading of 360 degrees. A few minutes later; departure control requested to know what heading we were assigned by lga tower; and I stated 'we weren't given a heading but cpdlc stated to expect a heading of 360 degrees.' nothing more was said. Thirty minutes passed; and I decided to reread the cpdlc and noticed my error of reading 'expect' instead of 'except'. No excuses; I was wearing my new glasses and it was light outside; there were no stressors during boarding. I plainly misread the clearance. We read what we think we want to see and perhaps my only recommendation would be: 1. First officer to be more thorough.2. I wish they (clearance) could use different verbiage and 3. Tower could reinforce the change to the standard clearance but I know lga is busy.'

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: First Officer reported a track error departing LGA citing error in reading CPDLC change of initial heading during predeparture briefing as probable cause.

Narrative: Controller pilot datalink Communication (CPDLC) instruction was 'Cleared to ZZZ APRT LGA5 EXCEPT TURN LEFT HDG 360 FOR RV THEN AS FILED'. When I received and acknowledged the clearance; I read it to the Captain stating EXPECT TURN TO 360 instead of EXCEPT ....' Nothing more; the Captain read the CPDLC and acknowledged what we briefed. Captain was PF. We were cleared for takeoff from Runway 4 and we commented that usually they state 'turn to heading ###'; however; Tower frequency was too busy to inquire and in the absence of further instruction we turned to the SID heading of 051 degrees. Once transferred to Departure Control; he gave us a heading of 360 degrees. A few minutes later; Departure Control requested to know what heading we were assigned by LGA Tower; and I stated 'We weren't given a heading but CPDLC stated to expect a heading of 360 degrees.' Nothing more was said. Thirty minutes passed; and I decided to reread the CPDLC and noticed my error of reading 'Expect' instead of 'Except'. No excuses; I was wearing my new glasses and it was light outside; there were no stressors during boarding. I plainly misread the clearance. We read what we think we want to see and perhaps my only recommendation would be: 1. First Officer to be more thorough.2. I wish they (Clearance) could use different verbiage and 3. Tower could reinforce the change to the standard clearance but I know LGA is BUSY.'

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.