C172 pilot reported that another aircraft landed despite being told that the runway was not clear; r...

Attributes
ACN	1682961
Time
Date	201909
Local Time Of Day	1201-1800
Place
Locale Reference	0W3.Airport
State Reference	MD
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Make Model Name	Cessna Aircraft Undifferentiated or Other Model
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	Taxi
Route In Use	None
Flight Plan	None
Aircraft 2
Make Model Name	Piper Aircraft Corp Undifferentiated or Other Model
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	Landing
Flight Plan	VFR
Person 1
Qualification	Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Commercial Flight Crew Flight Instructor
Experience	Flight Crew Last 90 Days 73 Flight Crew Total 4000 Flight Crew Type 1200
Events
Anomaly	Conflict Ground Conflict Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Ground Event / Encounter Aircraft Ground Incursion Runway

Narrative:

While dealing with monitoring runway incursions committed by local [company] ground vehicles crossing the departure end of runway 28; I looked for aircraft on approach to land on runway 28. No traffic observed I announced back-taxi runway 28. As I taxied east on runway 28 I observed a low wing airplane on short final then heard aircraft Y announce 'short final landing runway 28.' to avoid collision I taxied onto a perpendicular runway under construction. I announced I was unable to clear the runway safety area. The pilot of aircraft Y announced 'you're good' as I held position inside the runway safety area. Aircraft Y landed without incident and exited the runway for fuel service. My perception of the event is the pilot of aircraft Y made the decision to continue approach and landing knowing I was still inside the runway safety area because in his judgment my position did not pose a collision threat. Essentially the pilot of aircraft Y exploited provisions of 14 crash fire rescue equipment 91.119 (g) by forcing me off the runway. Furthermore the pilot displayed complacency and arrogance by accepting a risk on my behalf.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: C172 pilot reported that another aircraft landed despite being told that the runway was not clear; resulting in a runway incursion.

Narrative: While dealing with monitoring runway incursions committed by local [company] ground vehicles crossing the departure end of Runway 28; I looked for aircraft on approach to land on Runway 28. No traffic observed I announced back-taxi Runway 28. As I taxied east on Runway 28 I observed a low wing airplane on short final then heard Aircraft Y announce 'Short final landing Runway 28.' To avoid collision I taxied onto a perpendicular runway under construction. I announced I was unable to clear the runway safety area. The pilot of Aircraft Y announced 'You're good' as I held position inside the runway safety area. Aircraft Y landed without incident and exited the runway for fuel service. My perception of the event is the pilot of Aircraft Y made the decision to continue approach and landing knowing I was still inside the runway safety area because in his judgment my position did not pose a collision threat. Essentially the pilot of Aircraft Y exploited provisions of 14 CFR 91.119 (g) by forcing me off the runway. Furthermore the pilot displayed complacency and arrogance by accepting a risk on my behalf.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.