![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1682011 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201909 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | IKV.Airport |
| State Reference | IA |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | Marginal |
| Light | Night |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | TBM 700/TBM 850 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Climb |
| Route In Use | Vectors |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Supervisor / CIC |
| Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
| Experience | Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (yrs) 2 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Inflight Event / Encounter CFTT / CFIT |
Narrative:
I was working controller in charge in the TRACON; developmental released aircraft X off of runway 22 at ikv. Developmental assigned aircraft X a heading of 360 after departure due to traffic landing dsm. The developmental asked the pilot if this would comply with terrain and obstruction avoidance. The pilot answered affirmative. I told the developmental that the 360 heading was not a good idea as it will put the aircraft in a 4;000 ft. MSA during IFR/MVFR conditions. Developmental either ignored me or didn't hear apparently. Just because the pilot says he can maintain separation doesn't mean we should be assigning headings towards prominent obstructions; especially when the conditions make it impossible for them to comply. Aircraft X entered a 4;000 ft. MVA at approximately 2;800 ft. Prior to passing the altitude of the prominent obstruction. Assign headings away from obstructions for satellite airport departures when it is necessary to assign a heading.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: TRACON Controller in Charge [CIC] reported that a Developmental Controller released an aircraft out of a non-towered airport into airspace with a higher MVA against published procedures.
Narrative: I was working CIC in the TRACON; Developmental released Aircraft X off of Runway 22 at IKV. Developmental assigned Aircraft X a heading of 360 after departure due to traffic landing DSM. The Developmental asked the pilot if this would comply with terrain and obstruction avoidance. The pilot answered affirmative. I told the Developmental that the 360 heading was not a good idea as it will put the aircraft in a 4;000 ft. MSA during IFR/MVFR conditions. Developmental either ignored me or didn't hear apparently. Just because the pilot says he can maintain separation doesn't mean we should be assigning headings towards prominent obstructions; especially when the conditions make it impossible for them to comply. Aircraft X entered a 4;000 ft. MVA at approximately 2;800 ft. prior to passing the altitude of the prominent obstruction. Assign headings away from obstructions for satellite airport departures when it is necessary to assign a heading.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.