Atx small transport frt aircraft advised by ARTCC that a violation would be filed but no details wer...

Attributes
ACN	165932
Time
Date	199012
Day	Wed
Local Time Of Day	1201 To 1800
Place
Locale Reference	atc facility : oed airport : mfr
State Reference	OR
Altitude	msl bound lower : 9000 msl bound upper : 9000
Environment
Flight Conditions	Mixed
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Operator	common carrier : air taxi
Make Model Name	Small Transport, Low Wing, 2 Recip Eng
Flight Phase	cruise other descent other
Route In Use	enroute airway : v122
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	company : air taxi
Function	flight crew : single pilot
Qualification	pilot : atp pilot : cfi
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 40 flight time total : 5100 flight time type : 2000
ASRS Report	165932
Person 2
Affiliation	government : faa
Function	controller : approach
Qualification	controller : non radar
Events
Anomaly	non adherence : far
Independent Detector	other controllera
Resolutory Action	none taken : detected after the fact
Consequence	faa : investigated
Supplementary
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	other

Narrative:

I was on an IFR scheduled flight from aok-lmt-mfr-oak. Apparently on the leg lmt-oed, a violation was incurred either seattle center, or medford approach called headquarters in burbank, ca, to discuss this violation and also to say that the pilot (me) was going to be cited. One of the burbank mgrs called up to oak to mention that I was to be cited and I should send in a NASA form. I have since been trying to contact my chief pilot in bur to determine what my problem is. At this point he has not been able to get back to me. The flight, lmt-mfr was for me uneventful. I left lmt and was IMC as I remember for the first part of the leg. Center asked for me to report a DME distance out of oed. After that we were cleared for the VOR/DME 14 approach to mfr. The WX at mfr was scattered cumulus at about our altitude. I remember mentioning to approach that I was considering cancelling IFR and proceed VFR to the airport. At this point what is bothering me is that at no time did a controller tell me that a violation had been incurred.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ATX SMT FRT ACFT ADVISED BY ARTCC THAT A VIOLATION WOULD BE FILED BUT NO DETAILS WERE GIVEN.

Narrative: I WAS ON AN IFR SCHEDULED FLT FROM AOK-LMT-MFR-OAK. APPARENTLY ON THE LEG LMT-OED, A VIOLATION WAS INCURRED EITHER SEATTLE CTR, OR MEDFORD APCH CALLED HEADQUARTERS IN BURBANK, CA, TO DISCUSS THIS VIOLATION AND ALSO TO SAY THAT THE PLT (ME) WAS GOING TO BE CITED. ONE OF THE BURBANK MGRS CALLED UP TO OAK TO MENTION THAT I WAS TO BE CITED AND I SHOULD SEND IN A NASA FORM. I HAVE SINCE BEEN TRYING TO CONTACT MY CHIEF PLT IN BUR TO DETERMINE WHAT MY PROB IS. AT THIS POINT HE HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO GET BACK TO ME. THE FLT, LMT-MFR WAS FOR ME UNEVENTFUL. I L LMT AND WAS IMC AS I REMEMBER FOR THE FIRST PART OF THE LEG. CTR ASKED FOR ME TO RPT A DME DISTANCE OUT OF OED. AFTER THAT WE WERE CLRED FOR THE VOR/DME 14 APCH TO MFR. THE WX AT MFR WAS SCATTERED CUMULUS AT ABOUT OUR ALT. I REMEMBER MENTIONING TO APCH THAT I WAS CONSIDERING CANCELLING IFR AND PROCEED VFR TO THE ARPT. AT THIS POINT WHAT IS BOTHERING ME IS THAT AT NO TIME DID A CTLR TELL ME THAT A VIOLATION HAD BEEN INCURRED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.

Atx small transport frt aircraft advised by ARTCC that a violation would be filed but no details were given.