Narrative:

Before being handed off to approach control, the second officer properly filled out the ATIS card and passed it up to us. The altimeter setting was 28.96 but we set 29.86 in our altimeters. On the localizer approach we realized the error and executed a missed approach and then landed west/O incident. Contributing factors include turbulence, a busy approach, use of a non precision approach, and a much slower aircraft in front of us that we were continuously overtaking. In reconstructing the actual flight profile we feel confident that no minimum altitudes were violated. The responsibility for such a mistake is ours. However, in retrospect, the occurrence may have been avoided if each controller were to confirm altimeter settings as 'low' when they are below 29.00. Neither approach controller alerted us to low altimeter settings.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ACR LGT N DESCENT MISSET ALT.

Narrative: BEFORE BEING HANDED OFF TO APCH CTL, THE S/O PROPERLY FILLED OUT THE ATIS CARD AND PASSED IT UP TO US. THE ALTIMETER SETTING WAS 28.96 BUT WE SET 29.86 IN OUR ALTIMETERS. ON THE LOC APCH WE REALIZED THE ERROR AND EXECUTED A MISSED APCH AND THEN LANDED W/O INCIDENT. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS INCLUDE TURB, A BUSY APCH, USE OF A NON PRECISION APCH, AND A MUCH SLOWER ACFT IN FRONT OF US THAT WE WERE CONTINUOUSLY OVERTAKING. IN RECONSTRUCTING THE ACTUAL FLT PROFILE WE FEEL CONFIDENT THAT NO MINIMUM ALTS WERE VIOLATED. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH A MISTAKE IS OURS. HOWEVER, IN RETROSPECT, THE OCCURRENCE MAY HAVE BEEN AVOIDED IF EACH CTLR WERE TO CONFIRM ALTIMETER SETTINGS AS 'LOW' WHEN THEY ARE BELOW 29.00. NEITHER APCH CTLR ALERTED US TO LOW ALTIMETER SETTINGS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.