Narrative:

Aircraft X was inbound to apf and I was vectoring for a RNAV approach for runway 23 at apf. I descended the aircraft to 2100 and asked if he wanted the full approach or vectors. Looking at his altitude I did not think he would descend to below the MVA (minimum vectoring altitude) prior to passing the obstacle so I issued a descent to 1600 and a turn to heading 320. Aircraft X descended faster than expected and was below the MVA while he appeared to be over the depicted obstacle. Aircraft X then called the field in sight and was cleared for the visual approach runway 23 at apf.I will not assume a descent profile and just keep them above the MVA until I'm ready to clear the aircraft.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: Fort Meyers Approach Controller reported anticipating an aircraft would not descend below the Minimum Vectoring Altitude; but the aircraft descended quicker than the reporter expected resulting in a MVA violation.

Narrative: Aircraft X was inbound to APF and I was vectoring for a RNAV approach for RWY 23 at APF. I descended the aircraft to 2100 and asked if he wanted the full approach or vectors. Looking at his altitude I did not think he would descend to below the MVA (Minimum Vectoring Altitude) prior to passing the obstacle so I issued a descent to 1600 and a turn to heading 320. Aircraft X descended faster than expected and was below the MVA while he appeared to be over the depicted obstacle. Aircraft X then called the field in sight and was cleared for the visual approach RWY 23 at APF.I will not assume a descent profile and just keep them above the MVA until I'm ready to clear the aircraft.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.