![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1611367 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201901 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
| State Reference | US |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | IMC |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Widebody Transport |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Descent |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Component | |
| Aircraft Component | Pitot-Static System |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Person 2 | |
| Function | First Officer Pilot Not Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical Inflight Event / Encounter Weather / Turbulence |
Narrative:
Sometime on descent between FL290 and FL240; got numerous indications of pitot static icing; including IAS comparator alert on both pfds. Airspeed on captain's side indicated approximately 30 knots higher than first officer (first officer); and 20 knots higher than stby. Autopilot and autothrottles were inoperative. Ran QRH for airspeed unreliable. On final approach at 2000 ft; all indications returned to normal. Landed uneventfully.my impression was that the pitot static anti-icing systems seemed unable to keep up with high demand of heavy rain and low temperature; even though no icing was evident on the windscreen. Maintenance record after our write-up indicates that debris was found in the rh and auxiliary pitot systems.increase heating ability of pitot static system. I am sure pitot system inspections are normally adequate; but perhaps the interval for such inspections should be looked at.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Air Carrier flight crew reported IAS anomalies; probably due to pitot static icing.
Narrative: Sometime on descent between FL290 and FL240; got numerous indications of pitot static icing; including IAS comparator alert on both PFDs. Airspeed on Captain's side indicated approximately 30 knots higher than FO (First Officer); and 20 knots higher than STBY. Autopilot and Autothrottles were inoperative. Ran QRH for AIRSPEED UNRELIABLE. On final approach at 2000 FT; all indications returned to normal. Landed uneventfully.My impression was that the pitot static anti-icing systems seemed unable to keep up with high demand of heavy rain and low temperature; even though no icing was evident on the windscreen. Maintenance record after our write-up indicates that debris was found in the RH and AUX Pitot Systems.Increase heating ability of pitot static system. I am sure pitot system inspections are normally adequate; but perhaps the interval for such inspections should be looked at.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.