![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1597920 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201811 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
| State Reference | US |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | IMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Gulfstream G280 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Initial Climb |
| Route In Use | Vectors |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Component | |
| Aircraft Component | Pitot-Static System |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 58 Flight Crew Total 12254 Flight Crew Type 276 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Inflight Event / Encounter Weather / Turbulence |
Narrative:
Takeoff from ZZZ airport was normal until 400 feet AGL. Received windshear caution message; initiated full power climb; per windshear escape procedure. Received immediate approach to stall indication. Approximately 1;000 feet. AGL; autothrottles began to retard due to erratic airspeed indications. Disconnected autothrottles and did not engage autopilot. Continued climbing to cleared 2;500 feet MSL while assessing the problem. Determined that airspeed and altitude indications were inaccurate. ADC1; ADC2 and standby instruments were all unreliable. [Advised] approach [of our situation] and requested vectors for ILS xxr at ZZZ. During the flight; we experienced both low airspeed and over speed warnings in rapid succession. In addition; approach was delivering occasional low altitude alerts. Used standard power settings and angle of attack indications to maintain safe airspeed. Flew the ILS xxr; breaking out of clouds just prior to minimums for the approach. Position was right of the runway; so missed approach was initiated. Following climb out; requested vectors for second approach. Successfully completed the approach and accomplished uneventful landing on xxr. Cleared runway and terminated [our situation with ATC].post-flight revealed small pieces of black electrical tape covering all static ports on the aircraft. This tape had been to prevent water entering the pitot/static system during aircraft washing at our hangar. The tape was missed for removal after aircraft wash. Due to the size and color of the tape; it was missed during aircraft preflight by both maintenance and the pilots. Lack of static air information led to the erratic indications for all instruments.as corrective/preventative action following this incident; our flight department implemented changes to our aircraft washing procedures as well as exterior inspection procedures. Tape will no longer be used to cover static ports. The manufacturer's large; red overnight covers will be installed on the static ports prior to aircraft washing. A training session was completed for all department pilots and mechanics; wherein; a thorough exterior preflight inspection of the aircraft was completed with reference to the manufacturer's checklist. It was emphasized that maintenance and flight crews closely inspect the static port 'holes;' in addition to assessing the general condition of the static port areas. Pilots were instructed to use the manufacturer checklist for the next five preflight; then once per month thereafter.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: G280 Captain reported diverting due to inaccurate airspeed after departure. Post-flight inspection revealed pieces of electrical tape covering the pitot static system.
Narrative: Takeoff from ZZZ Airport was normal until 400 feet AGL. Received WINDSHEAR caution message; initiated full power climb; per windshear escape procedure. Received immediate approach to stall indication. Approximately 1;000 feet. AGL; autothrottles began to retard due to erratic airspeed indications. Disconnected autothrottles and did not engage autopilot. Continued climbing to cleared 2;500 feet MSL while assessing the problem. Determined that airspeed and altitude indications were inaccurate. ADC1; ADC2 and standby instruments were all unreliable. [Advised] Approach [of our situation] and requested vectors for ILS XXR at ZZZ. During the flight; we experienced both low airspeed and over speed warnings in rapid succession. In addition; Approach was delivering occasional low altitude alerts. Used standard power settings and Angle of Attack indications to maintain safe airspeed. Flew the ILS XXR; breaking out of clouds just prior to minimums for the approach. Position was right of the runway; so missed approach was initiated. Following climb out; requested vectors for second approach. Successfully completed the approach and accomplished uneventful landing on XXR. Cleared runway and terminated [our situation with ATC].Post-flight revealed small pieces of black electrical tape covering all static ports on the aircraft. This tape had been to prevent water entering the pitot/static system during aircraft washing at our hangar. The tape was missed for removal after aircraft wash. Due to the size and color of the tape; it was missed during aircraft preflight by both Maintenance and the pilots. Lack of static air information led to the erratic indications for all instruments.As corrective/preventative action following this incident; our flight department implemented changes to our aircraft washing procedures as well as exterior inspection procedures. Tape will no longer be used to cover static ports. The manufacturer's large; red overnight covers will be installed on the static ports prior to aircraft washing. A training session was completed for all department pilots and mechanics; wherein; a thorough exterior preflight inspection of the aircraft was completed with reference to the manufacturer's checklist. It was emphasized that Maintenance and flight crews closely inspect the static port 'holes;' in addition to assessing the general condition of the static port areas. Pilots were instructed to use the manufacturer checklist for the next five preflight; then once per month thereafter.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.