![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1589940 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201810 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
| State Reference | US |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Other All |
| Route In Use | VFR Route |
| Flight Plan | VFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Single Pilot Pilot Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Student |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 18 Flight Crew Total 18 Flight Crew Type 18 |
| Person 2 | |
| Function | Instructor |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Commercial Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Flight Instructor |
| Experience | Flight Crew Total 370 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Ground Event / Encounter Ground Strike - Aircraft |
Narrative:
During the preflight inspection; for a solo flight at my flight school; I observed a half-inch bend on both ends of the propeller. While I was observing; I believed that the aircraft was still airworthy and that the damage would have little to no effect on the flight. I was properly trained by my CFI; that any damage of the prop should be reported; but I failed to comprehend that the prop damage could have resulted in a major failure. During the flight I felt the airplane vibrate more than usual and the performance was sluggish; but nothing to warrant an emergency landing or aborting a takeoff. Because of the negligible effect that the damaged prop had on the airplane; to me it confirmed that nothing was wrong; which in hindsight I realize it was not a good decision. With this situation; I should have asked any other person; and my instructor whether or not the aircraft is airworthy due to the prop damage. In the future; I will report any minor or major problems with the aircraft to flight operations as a preventative measure. I feel that inexperience contributed to me making this decision. I will also be conducting post flight inspections more thoroughly after every flight.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: C172 flight instructors and a student pilot reported the student flew an aircraft with known prop damage.
Narrative: During the preflight inspection; for a solo flight at my flight school; I observed a half-inch bend on both ends of the propeller. While I was observing; I believed that the aircraft was still airworthy and that the damage would have little to no effect on the flight. I was properly trained by my CFI; that any damage of the prop should be reported; but I failed to comprehend that the prop damage could have resulted in a major failure. During the flight I felt the airplane vibrate more than usual and the performance was sluggish; but nothing to warrant an emergency landing or aborting a takeoff. Because of the negligible effect that the damaged prop had on the airplane; to me it confirmed that nothing was wrong; which in hindsight I realize it was not a good decision. With this situation; I should have asked any other person; and my instructor whether or not the aircraft is airworthy due to the prop damage. In the future; I will report ANY minor or major problems with the aircraft to flight operations as a preventative measure. I feel that inexperience contributed to me making this decision. I will also be conducting post flight inspections more thoroughly after every flight.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.