 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
GA small aircraft received a clearance as filed clearance from rno, but later discovered his filed flight plan and the flight plan being used by ATC were not the same.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 158168 |
| Time | |
| Date | 199009 |
| Day | Sun |
| Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : rno |
| State Reference | NV |
| Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | Mixed |
| Light | Dusk |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tower : rno tower : ffz |
| Operator | general aviation : personal |
| Make Model Name | Small Aircraft |
| Flight Phase | climbout : takeoff ground : preflight ground other : taxi |
| Route In Use | enroute airway : v6 enroute airway : v392 |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | Other |
| Function | flight crew : single pilot |
| Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : private |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 75 flight time total : 1000 flight time type : 500 |
| ASRS Report | 158168 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | government : faa |
| Function | controller : clearance delivery |
| Qualification | controller : non radar |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | non adherence : clearance other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
| Independent Detector | other controllera |
| Resolutory Action | other |
| Consequence | Other |
| Supplementary | |
| Primary Problem | Ambiguous |
| Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
My clearance from rno clearance delivery was 'cleared to 056 via mustang 1 departure, then as filed.' I had prefiled via dtc duat for 'rno-fmg-V6-sac-sgd-056,' however rno approach had my clearance as 'rno via FMG1.fmg to fmg, then V392 to sac.' no problem or far violation here, but 'cleared as filed' is potentially dangerous if the crew and ATC have different versions of the clearance.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: GA SMA RECEIVED A CLRNC AS FILED CLRNC FROM RNO, BUT LATER DISCOVERED HIS FILED FLT PLAN AND THE FLT PLAN BEING USED BY ATC WERE NOT THE SAME.
Narrative: MY CLRNC FROM RNO CLRNC DELIVERY WAS 'CLRED TO 056 VIA MUSTANG 1 DEP, THEN AS FILED.' I HAD PREFILED VIA DTC DUAT FOR 'RNO-FMG-V6-SAC-SGD-056,' HOWEVER RNO APCH HAD MY CLRNC AS 'RNO VIA FMG1.FMG TO FMG, THEN V392 TO SAC.' NO PROB OR FAR VIOLATION HERE, BUT 'CLRED AS FILED' IS POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS IF THE CREW AND ATC HAVE DIFFERENT VERSIONS OF THE CLRNC.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.