![]()  | 
            37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System  | 
            
                
  | 
        
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1581186 | 
| Time | |
| Date | 201809 | 
| Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 | 
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | SBCW.ARTCC | 
| State Reference | FO | 
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | IMC | 
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | B777 Undifferentiated or Other Model | 
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 | 
| Flight Phase | Final Approach | 
| Flight Plan | IFR | 
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Approach Captain Pilot Flying  | 
| Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP)  | 
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 90 Flight Crew Total 10425.82 Flight Crew Type 4043.05  | 
| Events | |
| Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types | 
Narrative:
Was initially told to expect ILS 9R about 50 to 60 miles from landing. Then; some 10 minutes later and much too close to landing; [we] were given an almost never used runway and approach. The approach controllers accent and english was very hard to understand requiring her to repeat the new approach clearance 4 times before all three of us agreed that the new runway was now ' left' and not the usual [runway] 9R; and that the approach was RNAV 9L zulu. This; in a very radio congested regime; required a lot of time. This added greatly to crew stress and time to rebrief a seldom used approach.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B777 Captain reported ATC increased the flight crew workload and stress level due to a communication breakdown and late runway change.
Narrative: Was initially told to expect ILS 9R about 50 to 60 miles from landing. Then; some 10 minutes later and much too close to landing; [we] were given an almost never used runway and approach. The approach controllers accent and English was very hard to understand requiring her to repeat the new approach clearance 4 times before all three of us agreed that the new runway was now ' LEFT' and not the usual [Runway] 9R; and that the approach was RNAV 9L Zulu. This; in a very radio congested regime; required a lot of time. This added greatly to crew stress and time to rebrief a seldom used approach.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.