Narrative:

On final approach for ILS 29 at cae, captain deviated to left on approach course and descended to approximately 1200' with field in sight. We had been told to expect ILS runway 11 (mistakenly, as ATIS reported ILS 29). This caused some cockpit confusion. Captain briefed approach for runway 29 and we were set up and cleared for same. However during vectoring and descent captain dialed in 110 in his course window and I didn't catch it. This caused the deviation to left of course on final. During deviation captain realized he had wrong course dialed in, changed it to 290 and recovered. Rest of approach and landing were uneventful. (We had the G/south centered but because of deviation from approach course tower said his alarm went off). Corrective action: set up for approach as early as possible and each pilot double check FMC set up.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ACR CREW SET UP FOR APCH BUT CAPT DIALED IN WRONG INBOUND RADIAL. HEADING DEVIATION.

Narrative: ON FINAL APCH FOR ILS 29 AT CAE, CAPT DEVIATED TO L ON APCH COURSE AND DSNDED TO APPROX 1200' WITH FIELD IN SIGHT. WE HAD BEEN TOLD TO EXPECT ILS RWY 11 (MISTAKENLY, AS ATIS RPTED ILS 29). THIS CAUSED SOME COCKPIT CONFUSION. CAPT BRIEFED APCH FOR RWY 29 AND WE WERE SET UP AND CLRED FOR SAME. HOWEVER DURING VECTORING AND DSNT CAPT DIALED IN 110 IN HIS COURSE WINDOW AND I DIDN'T CATCH IT. THIS CAUSED THE DEV TO L OF COURSE ON FINAL. DURING DEV CAPT REALIZED HE HAD WRONG COURSE DIALED IN, CHANGED IT TO 290 AND RECOVERED. REST OF APCH AND LNDG WERE UNEVENTFUL. (WE HAD THE G/S CTRED BUT BECAUSE OF DEV FROM APCH COURSE TWR SAID HIS ALARM WENT OFF). CORRECTIVE ACTION: SET UP FOR APCH AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE AND EACH PLT DOUBLE CHK FMC SET UP.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.