![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1563990 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201807 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
| State Reference | US |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | DA40 Diamond Star |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Initial Climb |
| Route In Use | Direct |
| Flight Plan | None |
| Component | |
| Aircraft Component | Airspeed Indicator |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Single Pilot |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Commercial |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 300 Flight Crew Total 750 Flight Crew Type 725 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe |
Narrative:
During a test flight; the aircraft in question was being test flown after a major repair. To test the attachment of the wing; a soft field take-off was performed to an immediate landing. On the second take-off the same technique was used; however during the acceleration part of the take-off the airspeed was noted to read zero on both the G1000 airspeed tape; as well as the analog indicator. Since the airplane was airborne and the runway is relatively short; it was questionable whether the airplane can land after having been stabilized in ground effect. The decision was to continue with climb out and come around for a landing using known pitch attitudes and power settings; as the approach strategy; and using the ground-speed from the GPS as a rough reference. No change in airspeed by activating pitot heat. When the alternate air source was opened a drastic change in the altimeter was noticed - 250 feet variation -; but no change in airspeed. Squawk was set to 7700; and approach was contacted as a standard procedure. The landing was executed and approach was contacted through a phone number upon request by ATC. The airplane suffered no damage at all. The mechanic re-inspected the airplane; the airspeed indicator was adjusted; the airplane was fast taxied twice and airspeed still did not read at all. The third time; the mechanic readjusted; and airspeed came alive during ground roll. Test flight continued with no other discrepancies noted.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: DA40 pilot reported the airspeed indicator failed during a test flight following major work on the aircraft.
Narrative: During a test flight; the aircraft in question was being test flown after a major repair. To test the attachment of the wing; a soft field take-off was performed to an immediate landing. On the second take-off the same technique was used; however during the acceleration part of the take-off the airspeed was noted to read zero on both the G1000 airspeed tape; as well as the analog indicator. Since the airplane was airborne and the runway is relatively short; it was questionable whether the airplane can land after having been stabilized in ground effect. The decision was to continue with climb out and come around for a landing using known pitch attitudes and power settings; as the approach strategy; and using the ground-speed from the GPS as a rough reference. No change in airspeed by activating pitot heat. When the alternate air source was opened a drastic change in the altimeter was noticed - 250 feet variation -; but no change in airspeed. Squawk was set to 7700; and Approach was contacted as a standard procedure. The landing was executed and Approach was contacted through a phone number upon request by ATC. The airplane suffered no damage at all. The mechanic re-inspected the airplane; the airspeed indicator was adjusted; the airplane was fast taxied twice and airspeed still did not read at all. The third time; the mechanic readjusted; and airspeed came alive during ground roll. Test flight continued with no other discrepancies noted.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.