![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1556372 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201807 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | GEG.TRACON |
| State Reference | WA |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Stratotanker 135 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Initial Climb |
| Route In Use | Vectors |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Departure |
| Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
| Experience | Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (yrs) 2 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Inflight Event / Encounter CFTT / CFIT |
Narrative:
I was training someone on west radar as aircraft X departed ska on the west climb; climbing to 050. Aircraft X checked on; and was radar identified. When the trainee was ready to turn aircraft X to the downwind; aircraft X did not respond. Aircraft X was not able to be reached for the next 20 miles. During that time; aircraft X entered a 059 MVA at 050. The trainee attempted to reach aircraft X on guard; on multiple frequencies; and through a company helicopter that was maneuvering in the area. Aircraft X was unable to be reached through any of these methods. Aircraft X eventually checked back on and said they had a 'comm' issue. I recommend a more extensive dialog and collaboration between ska and geg. It is important that aircraft departing ska have an understanding of how these situations can affect our workload. I believe controllers from both facilities and ska pilots would benefit from more inter-facility dialogs.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: GEG Controller reported KC135 departed; lost radios then entered subsequent higher Minimum Vectoring Altitude.
Narrative: I was training someone on West Radar as Aircraft X departed SKA on the West Climb; climbing to 050. Aircraft X checked on; and was radar identified. When the trainee was ready to turn Aircraft X to the downwind; Aircraft X did not respond. Aircraft X was not able to be reached for the next 20 miles. During that time; Aircraft X entered a 059 MVA at 050. The trainee attempted to reach Aircraft X on guard; on multiple frequencies; and through a company helicopter that was maneuvering in the area. Aircraft X was unable to be reached through any of these methods. Aircraft X eventually checked back on and said they had a 'comm' issue. I recommend a more extensive dialog and collaboration between SKA and GEG. It is important that aircraft departing SKA have an understanding of how these situations can affect our workload. I believe controllers from both facilities and SKA pilots would benefit from more inter-facility dialogs.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.