![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1539670 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201805 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | LNK.Airport |
| State Reference | NE |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Dusk |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Regional Jet 200 ER/LR (CRJ200) |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
| Route In Use | Visual Approach |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | First Officer Pilot Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Person 2 | |
| Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Inflight Event / Encounter CFTT / CFIT Inflight Event / Encounter Unstabilized Approach |
Narrative:
Flying to lnk and arriving from the north we were assigned a visual approach runway 36. We were vectored onto a close left downwind for runway 36 and cleared for the visual approach. As we were descending in VMC the radar altimeter briefly dipped below 1;000 feet and we received the egpws 'terrain' warning. We could clearly see the ground and airport; so I merely reduced my descent rate. I do not believe that we were less than 1;000 feet height above terrain.close-in downwind and the perception that I needed to 'get down' quickly to remain on glide path. Flying a visual left downwind from the right seat is also a contributing factor because it is difficult to accurately perceive spacing from final and when to turn or descend. This was my dumb mistake. I should have just extended the downwind to give us more time and space.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CRJ-200 flight crew reported receiving a ground proximity warning while conducting a visual approach.
Narrative: Flying to LNK and arriving from the north we were assigned a visual approach Runway 36. We were vectored onto a close left downwind for Runway 36 and cleared for the visual approach. As we were descending in VMC the Radar Altimeter briefly dipped below 1;000 feet and we received the EGPWS 'Terrain' warning. We could clearly see the ground and airport; so I merely reduced my descent rate. I do not believe that we were less than 1;000 feet height above terrain.Close-in downwind and the perception that I needed to 'get down' quickly to remain on glide path. Flying a visual left downwind from the right seat is also a contributing factor because it is difficult to accurately perceive spacing from final and when to turn or descend. This was my dumb mistake. I should have just extended the downwind to give us more time and space.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.