![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1515381 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201801 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
| State Reference | US |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | Mixed |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 145 ER/LR |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Initial Climb Takeoff |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Component | |
| Aircraft Component | Cockpit Window |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Person 2 | |
| Function | Pilot Not Flying First Officer |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Flight Deck / Cabin / Aircraft Event Other / Unknown |
Narrative:
Two separate issues; both caused by mechanic problems. The window likely had a seal issue; but one that was excessive enough to cause concern and thus a decision to return to the airport. The second issue; total icing system failure in icing conditions; was caused by something mechanical. Upon takeoff; we heard a loud noise coming from first officer's (first officer) window; indicating it wasn't sealed properly. We held pressurization and continued climb to 3000 MSL. We then had wing anti icing fail; followed by stabilizer and then master warning for anti-icing system fail. I continued to fly the aircraft and took the radios; and had first officer run QRH to try to regain icing protection. I notified ATC; set up for the runway; obtained performance; and briefed minimum required items for safe approach. First officer increased approach speed per QRH. We landed uneventfully and aircraft rescue and fire fighting followed us to [the] gate. A functioning aircraft would prevent this; however; I would like to add that a thorough pre-departure briefing that touches on who will accomplish what in an emergency can lead to a more cohesive flight deck and safe outcome. The emergency was handled safely but not as perfectly as I would have preferred. A briefing on specifically this subject; what to do in an emergency; could have alleviated some of the stress. I usually brief this but forgot to as we started our 4-day trip.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: EMB-145 flight crew reported returning to the departure airport after experiencing a window seal leak and an icing system failure.
Narrative: Two separate issues; both caused by mechanic problems. The window likely had a seal issue; but one that was excessive enough to cause concern and thus a decision to return to the Airport. The second issue; total icing system failure in icing conditions; was caused by something mechanical. Upon takeoff; we heard a loud noise coming from First Officer's (FO) window; indicating it wasn't sealed properly. We held pressurization and continued climb to 3000 MSL. We then had wing Anti Icing fail; followed by STAB and then Master Warning for anti-icing system fail. I continued to fly the aircraft and took the radios; and had FO run QRH to try to regain icing protection. I notified ATC; set up for the runway; obtained performance; and briefed minimum required items for safe approach. FO increased approach speed per QRH. We landed uneventfully and Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting followed us to [the] gate. A functioning aircraft would prevent this; however; I would like to add that a thorough pre-departure briefing that touches on who will accomplish what in an emergency can lead to a more cohesive flight deck and safe outcome. The emergency was handled safely but not as perfectly as I would have preferred. A briefing on specifically this subject; what to do in an emergency; could have alleviated some of the stress. I usually brief this but forgot to as we started our 4-day trip.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.