![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1498021 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201711 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | K90.TRACON |
| State Reference | MA |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Small Transport Low Wing 2 Recip Eng |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
| Flight Phase | Cruise |
| Route In Use | VFR Route |
| Flight Plan | VFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Make Model Name | Small Transport Low Wing 2 Recip Eng |
| Flight Phase | Cruise |
| Route In Use | None |
| Flight Plan | VFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Approach |
| Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
| Experience | Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (yrs) 2 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict NMAC Deviation - Procedural Other / Unknown |
Narrative:
Aircraft X requested VFR flight following for a short flight from at 1;000 feet. The pilot had opposite direction VFR traffic indicating 800 feet. I issued the traffic at 8 miles. Aircraft X did not have the traffic in sight. The VFR aircraft indicated level at 800 feet so at 5 miles I reissued the traffic and suggested a VFR climb if not in sight. Aircraft X did not have the traffic in sight and executed a climb to 1;500 feet. At 3 miles; I reissued the traffic and advised the pilot that the targets appeared likely to merge. The pilot did not request a vector for the traffic. Aircraft X then reported the traffic in sight at his same altitude of 1;500 feet; and not at the indicated 800 feet. During the time both before and after the conflict; the VFR traffic showed single sweep altitude changes to altitudes of 1;200; 1;600; and 1;700 feet; very infrequently.I should have issued proactive vectors to de-conflict the traffic situation since both altitudes were not verified.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: K90 TRACON Controller reported an unidentified VFR aircraft was a NMAC with a VFR aircraft the Controller was working.
Narrative: Aircraft X requested VFR flight following for a short flight from at 1;000 feet. The pilot had opposite direction VFR traffic indicating 800 feet. I issued the traffic at 8 miles. Aircraft X did not have the traffic in sight. The VFR aircraft indicated level at 800 feet so at 5 miles I reissued the traffic and suggested a VFR climb if not in sight. Aircraft X did not have the traffic in sight and executed a climb to 1;500 feet. At 3 miles; I reissued the traffic and advised the pilot that the targets appeared likely to merge. The pilot did not request a vector for the traffic. Aircraft X then reported the traffic in sight at his same altitude of 1;500 feet; and not at the indicated 800 feet. During the time both before and after the conflict; the VFR traffic showed single sweep altitude changes to altitudes of 1;200; 1;600; and 1;700 feet; very infrequently.I should have issued proactive vectors to de-conflict the traffic situation since both altitudes were not verified.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.