Narrative:

I noticed the new jeppfd-pro depiction of the 162 nm line off shore is different than the paper chart version. Specifically; the ohlaa intersection on AR24. The paper chart has ohlaa depicted inside the 162nm mile; the electronic one does not. The first version of the electronic data was even worse; depicting portions of AR23 outside the 162nm line. The paper chart depicts the line as a curve; which to me makes more sense; since the coast is not a series of straight lines. The jeppfd depiction is a straight line. It seems that the dispatch tools today show ohlaa as being outside of the 162 nm line. We should remove the paper charts; or fix the line on whichever source is wrong.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: Air carrier Captain reported the electronic JeppFD-Pro depiction of the 162 nm line offshore is different than the paper chart version.

Narrative: I noticed the new JeppFD-Pro depiction of the 162 nm line off shore is different than the paper chart version. Specifically; the OHLAA intersection on AR24. The paper chart has OHLAA depicted inside the 162nm mile; the electronic one does not. The first version of the electronic data was even worse; depicting portions of AR23 outside the 162nm line. The paper chart depicts the line as a curve; which to me makes more sense; since the coast is not a series of straight lines. The JeppFD depiction is a straight line. It seems that the dispatch tools today show OHLAA as being outside of the 162 nm line. We should remove the paper charts; or fix the line on whichever source is wrong.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.