![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1491237 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201710 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | OAK.Airport |
| State Reference | CA |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Large Transport |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Descent |
| Route In Use | Vectors |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Make Model Name | Widebody Transport |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Descent |
| Route In Use | Direct |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Approach |
| Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Airspace Violation All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Aircraft X was direct wuvon descending to 4;000 to intercept the final approach course to eventually get the field in sight and cleared for a visual approach. Aircraft Y was about 5 miles in trail direct frnny going slightly faster than aircraft X. As aircraft X was approaching the final; I observed that there was an unidentified VFR aircraft at their 11 o'clock northeast bound climbing out of 3;300 feet. I instructed aircraft X to amend their altitude to 4;500 for traffic. VFR traffic and aircraft X were going to merge so I turned aircraft X to go behind the traffic. This in turn caused aircraft X at 4;500 to cross the path of aircraft Y who was level at 5;000.in the process of recovering separation between aircraft X and aircraft Y; aircraft X descending to 5;000 may have penetrated niles airspace. Aircraft X was turned to a heading of 340 to continue their descent and away from niles airspace.I should have just turned aircraft X northbound; climbed and possibly resequenced them when the VFR target further became a factor. With aircraft Y 5SM in trail and keeping his speed at a higher velocity; it would have been the easiest option.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A TRACON Controller reported vectoring an aircraft off their approach to avoid unidentified VFR traffic lost required spacing with the arriving in trail traffic.
Narrative: Aircraft X was direct WUVON descending to 4;000 to intercept the final approach course to eventually get the field in sight and cleared for a visual approach. Aircraft Y was about 5 miles in trail direct FRNNY going slightly faster than Aircraft X. As Aircraft X was approaching the final; I observed that there was an unidentified VFR aircraft at their 11 o'clock northeast bound climbing out of 3;300 feet. I instructed Aircraft X to amend their altitude to 4;500 for traffic. VFR traffic and Aircraft X were going to merge so I turned Aircraft X to go behind the traffic. This in turn caused Aircraft X at 4;500 to cross the path of Aircraft Y who was level at 5;000.In the process of recovering separation between Aircraft X and Aircraft Y; Aircraft X descending to 5;000 may have penetrated Niles airspace. Aircraft X was turned to a heading of 340 to continue their descent and away from Niles airspace.I should have just turned Aircraft X northbound; climbed and possibly resequenced them when the VFR target further became a factor. With Aircraft Y 5SM in trail and keeping his speed at a higher velocity; it would have been the easiest option.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.