Narrative:

After launch (30 mins) drift line took me over a band of broken low clouds. The ground was never completely obscured; however, in order to land I had to penetrate the cloud layer in less than VFR conditions. The evasive or mitigating action I took was to extend my flight until I could line up on a spot where a hole in clouds was over an appropriate place to land. Further, because I could see through to the ground, my only concern was that no other aircraft was in the area. In order to prevent the situation: in this particular case I really don't think I would do anything differently. I believe the level of safety stayed solid because I had double the fuel required for the planned flight.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: 3 BALLOON PLTS REPORT DRIFTING OVER A BROKEN TO SCATTERED CLOUD LAYER AND HAVING TO DESCEND THROUGH A HOLE IN CONDITIONS THAT DID NOT MEET VFR MINIMUMS.

Narrative: AFTER LAUNCH (30 MINS) DRIFT LINE TOOK ME OVER A BAND OF BROKEN LOW CLOUDS. THE GND WAS NEVER COMPLETELY OBSCURED; HOWEVER, IN ORDER TO LAND I HAD TO PENETRATE THE CLOUD LAYER IN LESS THAN VFR CONDITIONS. THE EVASIVE OR MITIGATING ACTION I TOOK WAS TO EXTEND MY FLT UNTIL I COULD LINE UP ON A SPOT WHERE A HOLE IN CLOUDS WAS OVER AN APPROPRIATE PLACE TO LAND. FURTHER, BECAUSE I COULD SEE THROUGH TO THE GND, MY ONLY CONCERN WAS THAT NO OTHER ACFT WAS IN THE AREA. IN ORDER TO PREVENT THE SITUATION: IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE I REALLY DON'T THINK I WOULD DO ANYTHING DIFFERENTLY. I BELIEVE THE LEVEL OF SAFETY STAYED SOLID BECAUSE I HAD DOUBLE THE FUEL REQUIRED FOR THE PLANNED FLT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.