 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Crj-900 flight crew reported going-around after receiving an alert that the landing gear was not extended on short final.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1418746 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201701 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
| State Reference | US |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | IMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Regional Jet 900 (CRJ900) |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Final Approach |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Pilot Flying Captain |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Person 2 | |
| Function | First Officer Pilot Not Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Inflight Event / Encounter Unstabilized Approach |
Narrative:
During ILS approach (PF); approaching the final approach fix; directed 'check spoilers; gear down; before landing checks.' tower had initially cleared us to land outside the FAF. During the landing checklist; ATC canceled landing clearance due to departing traffic. This caused an interrupt; after the ATC read back; completed the checklist. At approximately 1000 AGL; the radar altimeter warning horn sounded. I verified the gear indications; which indicated not down and locked. Commenced missed approach; vectored back around and landed normally.lack of proper checklist procedure after interruption. The PNF had not extended the landing gear when directed and improper crosscheck by PF had missed this during checklist. Contributing factors; ATC was a distraction with a landing clearance; then cancellation; then clearance to land again on the final segment; after approach control had issued a maintain 170 knots to the FAF; with subsequent configuration change (flaps and airspeed); to fly the ILS and landing.proper adherence of the SOP on interrupted checklist and cross checking. Diligence to avoid complacency interpreting aircraft state versus expected aircraft state. It would be a good feature if the aircraft would give an alert if the flaps are extended beyond 20 degrees with the gear still up.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CRJ-900 flight crew reported going-around after receiving an alert that the landing gear was not extended on short final.
Narrative: During ILS approach (PF); approaching the final approach fix; directed 'check spoilers; gear down; before landing checks.' Tower had initially cleared us to land outside the FAF. During the landing checklist; ATC canceled landing clearance due to departing traffic. This caused an interrupt; after the ATC read back; completed the checklist. At approximately 1000 AGL; the radar altimeter warning horn sounded. I verified the gear indications; which indicated not down and locked. Commenced missed approach; vectored back around and landed normally.Lack of proper checklist procedure after interruption. The PNF had not extended the landing gear when directed and improper crosscheck by PF had missed this during checklist. Contributing factors; ATC was a distraction with a landing clearance; then cancellation; then clearance to land again on the final segment; after approach control had issued a maintain 170 knots to the FAF; with subsequent configuration change (flaps and airspeed); to fly the ILS and landing.Proper adherence of the SOP on interrupted checklist and cross checking. Diligence to avoid complacency interpreting aircraft state versus expected aircraft state. It would be a good feature if the aircraft would give an alert if the flaps are extended beyond 20 degrees with the gear still up.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.