Narrative:

Low time first officer (1st flight after IOE) was flying visual. We were cleared for a visual approach. It was little high and fast so I suggested to him to slow down and start to configure. As he was extending the flight spoilers; inboard spoilerons; outboard spoilers caution message came on. I ran the QRH; stowed the flight spoilers according to the QRH procedure. At FAF; gear was extended; flaps were extended to 30. At this time; we encountered gust wind to cause aircraft nose to be pushed down which caused an unstabilized approach. It was too fast. I told first officer (first officer) to go-around but he insisted that he can land. I told him 'my airplane' took over the control and missed approached. As I was going around; I could not get first officer to do anything. He was frozen. I had to configure the airplane for go-around. By the time I engaged the auto pilot and asked for heading for a vector to come around; I was at 4;000 instead of 3;000 missed approach altitude. I reported to tower that we missed approach with current altitude. Then they assigned us 4;000 instead of 3;000. They cleared us to land via traffic pattern. We configured and landed safely.I should have executed the go-around procedure earlier. Go-around and run the QRH and fix the problem in order to have a stablized approach. That would have given us more time as a crew especially having low time pilot.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: CRJ-700 Captain reported an altitude overshoot on go-around due to a spoileron/outboard spoiler malfunction.

Narrative: Low time First Officer (1st flight after IOE) was flying visual. We were cleared for a visual approach. It was little high and fast so I suggested to him to slow down and start to configure. As he was extending the flight spoilers; Inboard Spoilerons; Outboard Spoilers Caution Message came on. I ran the QRH; stowed the flight spoilers according to the QRH procedure. At FAF; gear was extended; flaps were extended to 30. At this time; we encountered gust wind to cause aircraft nose to be pushed down which caused an unstabilized approach. It was too fast. I told First Officer (FO) to Go-Around but he insisted that he can land. I told him 'my airplane' took over the control and Missed approached. As I was going around; I could not get First Officer to do anything. He was frozen. I had to configure the airplane for Go-Around. By the time I engaged the auto pilot and asked for HDG for a vector to come around; I was at 4;000 instead of 3;000 missed approach altitude. I reported to tower that we missed approach with current altitude. Then they assigned us 4;000 instead of 3;000. They cleared us to land via traffic pattern. We configured and landed safely.I should have executed the Go-Around procedure earlier. Go-Around and run the QRH and fix the problem in order to have a stablized approach. That would have given us more time as a crew especially having low time pilot.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.