Narrative:

While on instrument approach GPS 31 to pao I started to receive unreliable indications of vertical speed from G1000 avionics; with vs varying momentarily to +/- 1000 ft/min. Since I was flying a coupled approach the autopilot started to correct. This resulted in the airplane descending below a segment altitude of 2000 ft. This in turn triggered [an] altitude alert from pao tower. I corrected by switching off the autopilot and flying by hand. I continued the approach and realized the indications of the G1000 were still unreliable. While in VMC and with airport and runway environment in sight I positioned the aircraft for circle to land approach and descended below circling altitude which was noted by the tower. I continued to successful landing using the standby altimeter only.in retrospect after the first indication of widely changing vertical speed from G1000 I should have continued flying using the standby instruments only. The G1000 is going to be reviewed by the authorized avionics shop. I want to stress that the event happened in VMC and I had visual contact with the ground at all times.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: Cessna pilot reported ATC advised him of several altitude deviations that resulted from anomalies within the G1000 vertical speed display.

Narrative: While on instrument approach GPS 31 to PAO I started to receive unreliable indications of vertical speed from G1000 avionics; with VS varying momentarily to +/- 1000 ft/min. Since I was flying a coupled approach the autopilot started to correct. This resulted in the airplane descending below a segment altitude of 2000 ft. This in turn triggered [an] altitude alert from PAO Tower. I corrected by switching off the autopilot and flying by hand. I continued the approach and realized the indications of the G1000 were still unreliable. While in VMC and with airport and runway environment in sight I positioned the aircraft for circle to land approach and descended below circling altitude which was noted by the tower. I continued to successful landing using the standby altimeter only.In retrospect after the first indication of widely changing vertical speed from G1000 I should have continued flying using the standby instruments only. The G1000 is going to be reviewed by the authorized avionics shop. I want to stress that the event happened in VMC and I had visual contact with the ground at all times.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.