Narrative:

Arriving at phx skyharbor airport, our flight was rdr vectored 170 degree magnetic departing the srp 312 degree radial/26 DME fix and descending to 7000' MSL for landing on runway 8R. Control was handed to the final controller who cleared our flight for the 'freeway visibility' to 8R, a published visibility approach. I descended to 3100' MSL as the published approach advises to complete base turn above 4000' MSL and cross 13 DME west at 3100 MSL. We were on base leg. Descending through 3500' MSL the final controller advised we were below the TCA. Phoenix has a new TCA and a published visibility approach which if followed will allow descent below the TCA, which is not depicted on the approach plate. The degenerating effect on safety is obvious. The TCA's are almost universally difficult to define. Many boundaries are defined by landmarks which IFR flown aircraft have little means of determining. TCA charts are carried but are 1) too small to read accurately, 2) do not adequately provide radio navigation boundaries and 3) must be interpreted by a pilot in a darkened cockpit while at the same time the same pilot is responsible to 'see and avoid' all traffic. In trying to obey the letter of the law, the purpose (traffic sep) is totally compromised.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: REPORTER FLT MAY HAVE DESCENDED BELOW TCA WHILE COMPLETING VISUAL APCH.

Narrative: ARRIVING AT PHX SKYHARBOR ARPT, OUR FLT WAS RDR VECTORED 170 DEG MAGNETIC DEPARTING THE SRP 312 DEG RADIAL/26 DME FIX AND DSNDING TO 7000' MSL FOR LNDG ON RWY 8R. CTL WAS HANDED TO THE FINAL CTLR WHO CLRED OUR FLT FOR THE 'FREEWAY VIS' TO 8R, A PUBLISHED VIS APCH. I DSNDED TO 3100' MSL AS THE PUBLISHED APCH ADVISES TO COMPLETE BASE TURN ABOVE 4000' MSL AND CROSS 13 DME W AT 3100 MSL. WE WERE ON BASE LEG. DSNDING THROUGH 3500' MSL THE FINAL CTLR ADVISED WE WERE BELOW THE TCA. PHOENIX HAS A NEW TCA AND A PUBLISHED VIS APCH WHICH IF FOLLOWED WILL ALLOW DSCNT BELOW THE TCA, WHICH IS NOT DEPICTED ON THE APCH PLATE. THE DEGENERATING EFFECT ON SAFETY IS OBVIOUS. THE TCA'S ARE ALMOST UNIVERSALLY DIFFICULT TO DEFINE. MANY BOUNDARIES ARE DEFINED BY LANDMARKS WHICH IFR FLOWN ACFT HAVE LITTLE MEANS OF DETERMINING. TCA CHARTS ARE CARRIED BUT ARE 1) TOO SMALL TO READ ACCURATELY, 2) DO NOT ADEQUATELY PROVIDE RADIO NAV BOUNDARIES AND 3) MUST BE INTERPRETED BY A PLT IN A DARKENED COCKPIT WHILE AT THE SAME TIME THE SAME PLT IS RESPONSIBLE TO 'SEE AND AVOID' ALL TFC. IN TRYING TO OBEY THE LETTER OF THE LAW, THE PURPOSE (TFC SEP) IS TOTALLY COMPROMISED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.