Narrative:

Training in progress on local 1. Aircraft X (cessna 172) departed straight out VFR. Aircraft Y (PA28) departed second IFR. Aircraft Y was issued traffic and told aircraft X was departing straight out. There was a layer of stratus clouds over the shore and aircraft Y went in a cloud and lost sight of aircraft X. We didn't use correct phraseology for issuing visual separation. We could have turned the VFR aircraft 15 degrees to the right to guarantee separation from IFR traffic. As a trainer; I should have been more aware of my trainee's plan and helped them execute it more smoothly.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A Tower Controller reported that his trainee did not use correct phraseology to apply visual separation with successive departures. The second departure lost sight of the first departure and the pilot declared a NMAC.

Narrative: Training in progress on Local 1. Aircraft X (Cessna 172) departed straight out VFR. Aircraft Y (PA28) departed second IFR. Aircraft Y was issued traffic and told Aircraft X was departing straight out. There was a layer of stratus clouds over the shore and Aircraft Y went in a cloud and lost sight of Aircraft X. We didn't use correct phraseology for issuing Visual Separation. We could have turned the VFR aircraft 15 degrees to the right to guarantee separation from IFR traffic. As a trainer; I should have been more aware of my trainee's plan and helped them execute it more smoothly.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.